3.) My mother offered to help by signing a one-year lease
Theresa Crow for a rental located at 1335 North Limestone St. in
Springfield Ohio and the three of us met on location.
Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1
5.) Due to electrical deficiencies and other problems with
rental, I ((empasis on I; can another person terminate any other
person's lease agreement? If so, we'd all be in trouble), I gave
notice to vacate about
a year later and a "walkthrough" inspection was conducted by Eric Crow
6.) However, a few months after I vacated a notice came in the mail
at my new residence that I was being threatened by the Crows for a property damage claim!
I replied to the Crows that they were made aware of each and every
disaster that occurred in their property (once I even called at 2am to
inform them of a busted water pipe caused by the frost) and that I had
showing the true cause of damages and that I caused no intentional
damage (did I scuff the wall when moving my stuff to safety from the
waterfall from upstairs is another story for another page).
is one of many
videos wmvflvmp4movdvdavi that is on the Court Record, yet the Judge denied all evidences
and even denied the actual tenant/occupant from the Case, but why? Video
shows where damages came
from. It was the upstairs tenant's plumbing, and later an
fire. The landlord and his agents must go through my downstairs
rental in order to get to plumbing, electrical, air conditioners, etc.
which are all housed in the basement. Regardless of whether the
mud came from the muddy basement or the muddy fire, it should not be
either the liability of the tenant, or the former tenant.
Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1
*Later, although the Lessor unlawfully kept the deposit beyond that
which is lawful, the Court would award a deposit to the Lessor.
But why? The Lessor's Lease doesn't specify anything about a
deposit. However the Lessor does admit to their being a deposit
in two documents already submitted to the Court Record. So
regardless of who the Court wishes to believe was the tenant is
immaterial when the Court has willingly allowed a fictitious Lease,
from a fictitious Company (Tec Rentals), neither of which exist.
8.) Both of my Requests to present evidence and witnesses
were Denied by Judge Thomas Trempe of Clark County Municipal Court,
given were the following reasons:
9. Having been denied twice by the Clark County Municipal Court
prior to Pre-Trial, I appealed to the Appellate Divisionto
that the decision by the municipal court judge denying my becoming a
party to the case be
overturned and allow me to present evidence to show that the
allegations are fraudulent and knowingly directed to the wrong
party. The appeal was for a 60(b) motion and was accepted in the
Appellate Court in September 22,
However the Court did not perform a
60(b) motion, and instead allowed the lower court to progress to
trial until many
months later, AND still did not respond until ANOTHER 5 months
lower court disregarded waiting for the Appellate to come back with an
answer to determine whether it was lawful to deny evidence in an
ongoing case in which the third party was the only person on the planet
that could be proven to be the tenant regarding the exact case being
heard in the Court.
Instead, the Appellate, When the Appellate
did respond, it was to this: Problem
ruling as if the appeal I made to the
Appellate at pre-trial
would have any bearing to a trial decision of the lower court months in
the future. appealed to the Appellate Division
To make matters worse, on March 27,
2018, the Appellant sends me a letter addressed as a
I have not noticed any loss of command of my mail and would bank my
mother's life on the fact that the Courts cannot show they've ever sent
a previous notice, although their letter claims they've sent "numerous notices".
The Appellate has sent "Final Notice" demand for money.
It is well established that a payment MUST be made
at the time of filing
must include an afidavit of
before an appeal can be accepted.
As seen on the Court's own website, the afidavit was accepted in their
office on 9/22/16 (TAGCPM.PA.PublicPortal). Appeal
as if it were an appeal to the future verdict of the Trial (in effect
stopping all Appeals to the lower Court Trial altogether).
10.) The Second Appellate Court did not bother to intervene
or answer until 5 months A F T E R the lower Court went ahead
with Trial holding my mother un-represented and un-assisted in a
would NOT be allowed to present evidences to a case in which I am
the obvious correct party to.
I was asked to take down my mailbox
that was approved by the UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE).
*This video has been pulled by the Youtube censorship wheel, sorry but
this video is only available to download (right-click the file format
of your choice and choose "save-as":