3.) My mother offered to help by signing a one-year lease
Theresa Crow for a rental located at 1335 North Limestone St. in
Springfield Ohio and the three of us met on location.
Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1
5.) Due to electrical deficiencies and other problems with
rental, approximately one year later I gave
notice to Eric Crow to vacate, a "walkthrough" inspection was conducted by Eric Crow
and I.(*empasis on I; can another person
terminate any other
person's lease agreement? If so, we'd all be in trouble)
6.) However, a few months after I vacated a notice came in the mail
at my new residence that I was being threatened by the Crows for a property damage claim!
I replied to the Crows that they were made aware of each and every
disaster that occurred in their property (once I even called at 2am to
inform them of a busted water pipe caused by the frost, a.k.a his lack
of insulating his plumbing from the cold which caused damages to my
personal property) and that I had
showing the true cause of damages caused by the water and debris
falling from the ceiling from the upstairs tenant's plumbing.
following is one of many
videos that show not my mom nor I could possibly have been the "cause"
for damages to the Springfield Ohio Property owned by Eric and Theresa
Yet, as seen on the Court Record, the Judge denied all
and even denied the actual tenant/occupant from the Case, but why?
show where damages came
from. It was the upstairs tenant's plumbing and/or the landlord/plumber's shortcomings, and later an
fire which occurred during my last month there (after
the walkthrough inspection). The landlord and his agents must go
through my downstairs
rental in order to get to plumbing, electrical, air conditioners, etc.
which are all housed in the basement. This is how the landlord's
carpets partially were made to become damaged as shown in the videos
that were not
permitted to be entered because I was arbitrarily denied to A. Become a
party to the case and B. ALL evidences were denied. Regardless of
mud came from the muddy basement or the muddy fire, it should not be
either the liability of the tenant, or the former tenant.
If you want the short version of this website, it's that The "judge" rules that the downstairs PREVIOUS tenant is liable for the
actions and causes derived from the upstairs!
7.) The Courts denied my two written requests to become a party to
the case. Both
were submitted and are on Court Recordprior
to Pre-Trial. Yet when Pre-Trial did arrive, my mom's paid attorney, after first convincing her to leave the State she was then-domiciled in and to address the false
allegations against her, then at Pre-Trial slithered
from the judge's chambers to inform her that he would not be able to
represent her. The judge emerged to inform her to find another
attorney and, oh by the way, the trial is set for a couple of months
later (despite the fact that I already appealed his prior decision to
evidence and my person to become a RIGHTFUL party to the case appealed
to the Appellate Division, submitted promptly after my motions were
denied (yet are on the court record, just as the physical and URL
versions of the videos, photos, etc.).
The 60b motion was submitted to the Appellate Division, stamped as
entered, and then I received notice that they wanted a professional
Brief (or whatever it's called....something like 15 pages long).
I did it, you'll see the professional request for help listed below.
Instead the Appellate would not respond until 5 months after my
mom was held unrepresented and not permitted to have assistance in the
lower Municipal Court Trial which claimed she must defend herself
against a claim which clearly is an impossible claim and the Court was
made well aware of this (see court record). She is over 70 years of age).
At trial, with my mother was left unrepresented, the Court allowed her no
assistance, the judge declares his best
judgment, referencing the previous lease, my mother's, stating,
"The written lease was for a term of 12 months, and provided that the
tenancy would continue on a month to month basis ".
Now had a real judge of good character been unswayed from his lofty
over-paid position and allowed the evidence into the courtroom, he'd
discover that MY RENTAL RECEIPTS SHOW THAT I paid QUARTERLY (for one)
and that I was the subsequent tenant and that I gave my 30 day notice a
year beyond my mother's lease. He'd also discover a letter
written by the crows themselves in which they state "...DAMAGES WHICH
OCCURRED DURING KENNY'S TENANCY". (*I'm Kenny)
The fact is, this was a malicious show of government gone awry, and
surely not worth financing. It is my hopes that the Federal
Government will alleviate all the states of their wasteful middle-man
facades and make this nation a model nation for the world to emulate
(as opposed to the disgust most nations now have toward our crookedness
of those that ought have a bit more couth about themselves).
I'm not an attorney. I've not even graduated high school. I
should be sorry I don't speak the neo-court's nomenclature?
The perversion of our common colloquial and nationally-known
vocabulary is evidenced by the Court's manipulation of the word
"intervene" to mean
something totally different.
If they are not a court for the
citizens then what have the citizens to do with such a scourge?
Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1
*Although the Landlord unlawfully kept the deposit beyond the legal
time-frame, the Court would award even the unlawfully withheld Deposit to the Landlord's Husband
(*You heard right, a guy who was not on my mother's lease. He
would be the orchestrator of the SUBSEQUENT LEASE however. Which
makes me the Tenant and if I'm found guilty of damages it's THEN that
Mr. Crow and not Theresa Crow as the rightful benefiary of whatever
happened in this disgraceful system of "justice".
Mr. Crow is the winner according to the court, But why? The Husband wasn't on the lease and only I, my mother,
and the landlord (Theresa Crow) were present when mom's lease was agreed
upon. The Lessor's Lease that was submitted and accepted by
the Court doesn't even specify anything about a
(their incorrect lease also doesn't have the name of the husband on the
lease). However the Landlord does admit (and even make demand for) the deposit,
which in of itself proves my mom's authentic lease (the one not allowed
by the Court) as
being the authentic version (it mentions the deposit in the Landlord's
own handwriting right at the bottom of the lease, and no, we are not
forgers willing to violate a higher law).
irregardless of who the Court wishes to believe was the tenant is
immaterial when the Court has willingly allowed a fictitious Lease,
from a fictitious Company (Tec Rentals), neither of which exists.
8.) Evidences on the Court Record and witnesses
were Denied by Judge Thomas Trempe of Springfield Ohio's Clark County
given were the following reasons:
9. Having been denied twice by the Clark County Municipal Court
prior to Pre-Trial, I appealed to the Appellate Divisionto
that the decision by the municipal court judge denying my becoming a
party to the case be
overturned and to allow me to present evidences to show that the
allegations are fraudulent and knowingly directed toward the wrong
party (both actions being unlawful in every state of our beloved nation).
The appeal was for a 60(b) motion and was accepted in the
Appellate Court on September 22,2016.
However the Appellate Court did not perform a
60(b) motion, and instead allowed the lower court to progress to
months later. With a hush of non-participation by the Appellate
Branch of the Judiciary, there was not to be a response by the
Appellate until an additional 5 months
lower court disregarded waiting for the Appellate to come back with an
answer to determine whether it was lawful to deny evidence in an
ongoing case in which the third party was the only person on the planet
that could be proven to be the tenant regarding the exact case being
heard in the Court, and furthermore is narrating the actual videos as the disasters were occurring!
Instead, the Appellate, When the Appellate
did respond, it was to this: Judicial Farce
as if it were an appeal to the future verdict of the lower Court's illegal Trial, in effect
stopping all Appeals to the lower Court Trial altogether; five months
later stating the appellate's decision is unappealable. Shameful
waste of space and money, we could get more justice and do better with
bums running the court (in my arguably substantiated opinion).
10.) The Second Appellate Court did not bother to
or answer until 5 months A F T E R the lower Court went ahead
with Trial disregarding the motion to the appellate appealing to them
to judge between the judgment and the Motioneer (me. you won't
find it in black's legal dictionary), holding my mother
un-represented and un-assisted in a fraudulent Claim and Trial.
would NOT be allowed to present evidences to a case in which I am
the obvious correct party to.
It was asked of me, for the 5
minutes I was permitted into the court room,
Q: " Do you have
evidence to show the cause for damages ? ".
Me: "Why yes,
it's right in the back there", as I pointed to the back of the
courtroom. The judge was not even remotely curious enough to want
to see the evidences that answer my mother's question of whether or not
I had evidence to show her as innocent of the claims against her.
The judge wasn't
interested (smug thuggish behavior).
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a
copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone
records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes
such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including
multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an
infringement of copyright. Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat 2546)