Making this website has shown clearly the one-ness of the neo-corpo-politico-econo arena.
Our Nation CAN do Better.
Springfield Ohio, where robbing the elderly is respectable?
Clark County Municipal Court Sham(e)
Springfield's Disgraceful Gang-land Judiciary
The true story starts out like this:
1.) In 2012, a storm in Florida occurred that caused the ceiling and roof to fall-in leaving me without a place to call home.
2.) The Federal Agency, F.E.M.A., gave me a check to help, but I was still left with nowhere to go for more than 3 months. FEMA
3.) My mother offered to help by signing a one-year lease with Theresa Crow for a rental located all the way in Ohio at 1335 North Limestone St. in Springfield Ohio.
Theresa Crow, My Mother, and I met on location and a lease was signed for one year. Theresa Crow was made fully aware that I would locate the required identification from the packed 40 foot bus and that the lease would resume in my name. Days later while unpacking the bus, the identification was located and it was agreed that the first year lease would resume as written, between my mother and Theresa Crow and that the subsequent lease would resume in my name (allowing me time to recoup losses from the Florida storm and get back on my feet).
4.) Following my mother's one-year MONTHLY lease, I and the husband of the Lessor, Eric Crow, came to an agreement that I would resume the new lease under new pay arrangements. Whereas my mother's one-year lease was a monthly lease, mine would be a quarterly lease.
5.) Approximately one year later, due to electrical deficiencies and other problems with the rental,
I gave notice to Eric Crow to vacate.
Eric Crow and I walked through the entirety of the building and he only specified one solitary problem that he required me to repair (a small hole to allow alternate electricty into the building.
After the "walk-through" inspection was conducted by Eric Crow and I. (*emphasis
on I; can another person terminate any other person's lease agreement? If
so, we'd all be in trouble, obviously the Lease was in my name), I was told to fix a hole that had made a video of the hole
repair (and even repaired other areas which the landlord had not requested, which is
also contained on video).
During the final month following my notice to vacate came one disaster
after the other. There would be three sizable leaks from the upstairs
tenant and a fire, also by the upstairs tenant.
I called the fire department (which is on record and their public records name me fully in their reports), I put the fire out and called the landlord.
After being scolded by Theresa Crow for calling the Fire Department, I remember feeling glad to be soon leaving that rental (I remember vividly, I was on the 40' bus which was being packed with all the belongings in preparation for the move out).
Following many of the upstairs disasters, and the subsequent
repairs mostly made by the landlord himself, there were repeated needs to enter my rental to go down to the basement
with his plumbers, then the electrician, etc.
At first I did my best to
clean any shoe prints from their dirty shoes, but it became too much for me to be concerned about their messes, and I
focused rather on the packing and the hole repair.
I bothered to make videos showing the true cause of damages as they were
occurring. However, in a crooked court, no amount of evidence will save
us. As seen on the Court's own Public
Record, the Judge denied all evidences, and even denied the
actual tenant/occupant from presenting the Case and evidences within the
But why would the Clark County Municipal Court of Ohio lure my mother up
from Florida to be intent on finding
HER as the cause for damages (she's well over 70 years old and hundreds of
miles away from the Crow Rental)? The Courts have the videos but after
first allowing them on the Court Record denied them in the Court, have you
ever heard of such a sham?
Do you see my mother in this video compilation causing the damages
I began to upload the videos to YouTube (strangely enough, most of the
videos were pulled due to "complaints" having been made against my videos
(which merely showed water coming down from the ceiling and a upstairs
fire), then I read the law where the Police can take down videos and
Facebook accounts without a judicial process, the Crow son-in-law is a
Sheriff and lives with Mr. and Mrs. Crow (the Landlord and husband to the
To counteract the censoring I appealed to YouTube (about 40 times or so)
and then decided to move the videos to other sites (including Daily
Motion, Vimeo, Yandex, and others....still most of the sites would remove
the videos. The videos that simply show damages as they were occurring and nothing
more were apparently worthy of censorship).
To find out how a Court finds the previous downstairs tenant to pay for the damages caused by the upstairs tenant, click next.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of upper-class copyright protections. Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat 2546)