Springfield Ohio

Clark County Municipal Court


The true story starts out like this:
1.) In 2012, a storm in Florida occurred that caused the ceiling and roof to fall leaving me without a home.

2.) The Federal Agency, F.E.M.A., gave me a check to help, but I was still left with nowhere to go for more than 3 months.

FEMA Documented Proof Document FEMA

3.) My mother offered to help by signing a one-year lease with Theresa Crow for a rental located at 1335 North Limestone St. in Springfield Ohio and the three of us met on location.
The Real Lease Document Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1

4.) Following my mother's one-year MONTHLY lease, I and the husband of the Lessor came to an agreement that I would resume the new lease under new payment arrangements

New Lease arrangements Documented EvidenceNew Quarterly Pay Arrangement
New Payment Arrangements Documented EvidenceShows contrary to Court version of a MONTHLY Lease

5.) Due to electrical deficiencies and other problems with the rental, I ((empasis on I; can another person terminate any other person's lease agreement?  If so, we'd all be in trouble), I gave notice to vacate about a year later, a "walkthrough" inspection was conducted by Eric Crow and I.

6.) However, a few months after I vacated a notice came in the mail at my new residence that I was being threatened by the Crows for a property damage claim!   I replied to the Crows that they were made aware of each and every disaster that occurred in their property (once I even called at 2am to inform them of a busted water pipe caused by the frost) and that I had videos showing the true cause of damages and that I caused no intentional damage (did I scuff the wall when moving my stuff to safety from the waterfall from upstairs is another story for another page).

This is one of many videos wmv    flv    mp4    mov    dvd    avi that is on the Court Record, yet the Judge denied all evidences and even denied the actual tenant/occupant from the Case, but why?
 Video shows where damages came from.  It was the upstairs tenant's plumbing, and later an upstairs fire.  The landlord and his agents must go through my downstairs rental in order to get to plumbing, electrical, air conditioners, etc. which are all housed in the basement.  Regardless of whether the mud came from the muddy basement or the muddy fire, it should not be either the liability of the tenant, or the former tenant.

6.)  Yet a year after I vacated,  the Crows sued my Mother instead of me!

Wrongful Suit EvidenceSuit Claimed my 70+ year old mother "caused" the damages at the Crow property.

7.) The Courts denied my two written requests to become a party to the case, stating they have the wrong person being sued.  Both were submitted and are on Court Record prior to Pre-Trial.  At pre-trial my mom's paid attorney slithered from the judge's chambers to inform her that he would not be able to represent her.  The judge emerged to inform her to find another attorney and, oh by the way the trial is set for a couple of months later (despite the fact that I already appealed his decision to deny evidence and my person to become the RIGHTFUL party to the case).
At trial, with my mother left unrepresented and allowing her no assistance, like her son for instance, the judge declares his best judgment, referencing the previous lease, my mother's, stating,  " The written lease was for a term of 12 months, and provided that the tenancy would continue on a month to month basis ".

Now had a real judge of good character been unswayed from his lofty position and allowed the evidence into the courtroom, he'd invariably discover that MY RENTAL RECEIPTS SHOW THAT I paid QUARTERLY (for one) and that I was the subsequent tenant and that I gave my 30 day notice a year beyond my mother's lease.   He'd also discover a letter written by the crows themselves in which they state "...DAMAGES WHICH OCCURRED DURING KENNY'S TENANCY".

The fact is, this was a malicious show of government gone awry, and surely not worth financing.  It is my hopes that the Federal Government will alleviate all the states of their wasteful middle-man facades and make this nation a model nation for the world to emulate (as opposed to the disgust most nations now have toward our crookedness of those that ought have a bit more couth about themselves).

I'm not an attorney.  I've not even graduated high school.  I should be sorry I don't speak the neo-court's nomenclature (which appears more a perversion of our common colloquial and nationally known vocabulary...who knew they would confound the word "intervene" to mean something totally different?).
Devilishness, in my opinion.  If they are not a court for the citizens then what have the citizens to do with such a scourge?

Motion To Intervene
Request 1 Page 1 Document on Court Record 1st Request Page1  Request 1 Page 2 Document on Court Record 1st Request Page2  Request 1 Page 3 Document on Court Record 1st Request Page 3

Motion To Correct The Record
Request 2 Page 1 Document on Court Record 2nd Request Page 1  Request 2 Page 2 Document on Court Record  2nd Request Page 2  Request 2 Page 3 Document on Court Record 2nd Request Page 3

However the Court DID allow a fictitious Lease into the Court Record submitted by the Crows.
Fraudulent Lease Accepted by Court Evidence The Court's Fraudulent Lease Page1 which was submitted to the Court by the Crows and permitted in the Court Record by the rogue court of "law".

The Real Lease Document Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1
*Later, although the Lessor unlawfully kept the deposit beyond that which is lawful, the Court would award a deposit to the Lessor.  But why?  The Lessor's Lease doesn't specify anything about a deposit.  However the Lessor does admit to their being a deposit in two documents already submitted to the Court Record.  So regardless of who the Court wishes to believe was the tenant is immaterial when the Court has willingly allowed a fictitious Lease, from a fictitious Company (Tec Rentals), neither of which exist.

8.)  Both of my Requests to present evidence and witnesses were Denied by Judge Thomas Trempe of Clark County Municipal Court, given were the following reasons:

Springfield Ohio Scandal? Denied  Clark County Fraud? Denied

9. Having been denied twice by the

Clark County Municipal Court

 prior to Pre-Trial, I appealed to the Appellate Division 1st submission to the Appellateto request that the decision by the municipal court judge denying my becoming a party to the case be overturned and allow me to present evidence to show that the allegations are fraudulent and knowingly directed to the wrong party.  The appeal was for a 60(b) motion and was accepted in the Appellate Court in September 22, 2016.  However the Court did not perform a 60(b) motion,  and instead allowed the lower court to progress to trial until many months later, AND still did not respond until ANOTHER  5 months AFTER the lower court disregarded waiting for the Appellate to come back with an answer to determine whether it was lawful to deny evidence in an ongoing case in which the third party was the only person on the planet that could be proven to be the tenant regarding the exact case being heard in the Court.
Instead, the Appellate,
When the Appellate did respond, it was to this:
Ruling as if the appeal I made to the Appellate at pre-trial would have any bearing to a trial decision of the lower court months in the future.
appealed to the Appellate Division 1st submission to the Appellate

To make matters worse,  on March 27, 2018,  the Appellate Court sends me a letter addressed as a "final" notice (*big bold letters).
I have not noticed any loss of command of my mail and would bank my mother's life on the fact that the Courts cannot show/prove they've ever sent a previous notice, although their letter claims they've sent "numerous notices".  Fraud will not pull our nation out of this $21 TRILLION dollar debt (http://usdebtclock.org), leaders with creativity and courage will pull this nation out of it's dire unpublished present position of debt, stealing from old women will not accomplish a thing (aside from more ill-will for the mis-managers).

The Appellate has sent "Final Notice", a demand for money.

It is well established that a payment MUST be made at the time of filing an appeal to the appellate court.

must include an afidavit of indigence
before an appeal can be accepted into the court.  The fact that the belabored court clearly failed to respond and enforce some semblance of having a need for an Appellate court to intervene in a 60(b) motion, is testament of the affidavit's legitimacy (find a bank account with my name on it and i'll eat mushrooms again, for instance).

As seen on the Court's own website, the afidavit was accepted in their office on 9/22/16  (TAGCPM.PA.PublicPortal).

Appeal              Racket Bill  

Decision as if it were an appeal to the future verdict of the Trial, in effect stopping all Appeals to the lower Court Trial altogether; five months later stating the appellate's decision is unappealable.  Shameful waste of space and money, we could get more justice and do better with bums running the court (in my arguably substantiated opinion).

10.)  The Second Appellate Court did not bother to intervene or answer until 5 months A F T E R  the lower Court went ahead with Trial disregarding the motion to the appellate, holding my mother un-represented and un-assisted in a bad Trial.    I would NOT be allowed to present evidences to a case in which I am the obvious correct party to.  Oh it was asked of me for the 5 minutes I was permitted into the court room,  " Do you have evidence to show the cause for damages ? ".  Me:  "Why yes, it's right in the back there", pointing to the back of the courtroom where I left my bag to approach the bench.  The judge wasn't interested (smug thuggish behavior).

When the Appellate did respond, it was to this regard:

To find out how a Court finds the previous downstairs tenant to pay for the damages caused by the upstairs tenant, click next.


* My having published videos on youtube were censored.  So I uploaded to an alternative site:   showing the true cause for damages,

Suddenly Codes wanted to investigate me. 
  mp3   flv    mp4   avi  wav

Charter attack:

Denied Passport :


I was asked to take down my mailbox
(the one that was approved by the UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE).

*This video has been pulled by the Youtube censorship wheel, sorry but this video is only available to download (right-click the file format of your choice and choose "save-as":

avi   mp4   wmv   flv

See the timeline

  • Affirm
  • Appeal
  • Judge
  • Original Appeal
  • Motion to Intervene
  • More Criminal
  • Another Judge
  • Fair Use Clause

    107: Limitatons on exclusive rights: Fair Use

    Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat 2546)


    Sites of Clark County Community Interest:
    Bible         Clark County Terror       Ohio's Shame             Municipal Court Racket?       "My people, when ye see these signs, come out of her" Holy Crap, my Passport is denied!     Brick Projects       Solar Projects

    2803 Troy Road Springfield Ohio 45504 Product of USA

    +1 (937) 718-3586