Springfield Ohio

Clark County Municipal Court Sham(e)

Springfield's Disgraceful Judiciary


The true story starts out like this:
1.) In 2012, a storm in Florida occurred that caused the ceiling and roof to fall-in leaving me without a place to call home.

2.) The Federal Agency, F.E.M.A., gave me a check to help, but I was still left with nowhere to go for more than 3 months.


FEMA Documented Proof Document FEMA

3.) My mother offered to help by signing a one-year lease with Theresa Crow for a rental located at 1335 North Limestone St. in Springfield Ohio and the three of us met on location.
Genuine Springfield Ohio Rental Lease Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1

4.) Following my mother's one-year MONTHLY lease, I and the husband of the Lessor came to an agreement that I would resume the new lease under new payment arrangements

Genuine Springfield Ohio Rental AgreementNew Quarterly Pay Arrangement
Springfield Ohio ignores evidenceShows contrary to Court version of a MONTHLY Lease


5.) Due to electrical deficiencies and other problems with the rental,  approximately one year later I gave notice to Eric Crow to vacate, a "walk-through" inspection was conducted by Eric Crow and I.   (*emphasis on I; can another person terminate any other person's lease agreement?  If so, we'd all be in trouble)

6.) However, a few months after I vacated a notice came in the mail at my new residence that I was being threatened by the Crows for a property damage claim!   I replied to the Crows that they were made aware of each and every disaster that occurred in their property (once I even called at 2am to inform them of a busted water pipe caused by the frost, a.k.a his lack of insulating his plumbing from the cold which caused damages to my personal property) and that I had videos showing the true cause of damages caused by the water and debris falling from the ceiling from the upstairs tenant's plumbing.


My mom nor I could possibly have been the "cause" for damages to the Springfield Ohio Property owned by Eric and Theresa Crow
Yet, as seen on the Court Record,  the Judge denied all evidences and even denied the actual tenant/occupant from the Case, but why?


Videos show where damages came from. It was the upstairs tenant's plumbing and/or the landlord/plumber's shortcomings, and later an upstairs fire which occurred during my last month there (after the walk-through inspection).  The landlord and his agents must go through my downstairs rental in order to get to plumbing, electrical, air conditioners, etc. which are all housed in the basement.  This is how the landlord's carpets partially were made to become damaged as shown in the videos that were not permitted to be entered because I was arbitrarily denied to A. Become a party to the case and B. ALL evidences were denied.  Regardless of whether the mud came from the muddy basement or the muddy fire, it should not be either the liability of the tenant, or the former tenant.

If you want the short version of this website, it's that The "judge" rules that the downstairs PREVIOUS tenant is liable for the actions and causes derived from the upstairs!

6.)  Yet a year after I vacated,  the Crows sued my Mother instead of me!
I'm over 50 years on this planet.
Wrongful Suit EvidenceSuit Claimed my 70+ year old mother "caused" the damages at the Crow property.

7.) The Courts denied my two written requests to become a party to the case.  Both were submitted and are on Court Record prior to Pre-Trial.  Yet when Pre-Trial did arrive,  my mom's paid attorney, after first convincing her to leave the State she was then-domiciled in and to address the false allegations against her, then at Pre-Trial slithered from the judge's chambers to inform her that he would not be able to represent her.  The judge emerged to inform her to find another attorney and, oh by the way, the trial is set for a couple of months later (despite the fact that I already appealed his prior decision to deny evidence and my person to become a RIGHTFUL party to the case appealed to the Appellate Division, submitted promptly after my motions were denied (yet are on the court record, just as the physical and URL versions of the videos, photos, etc.).  The 60b motion was submitted to the Appellate Division, stamped as entered, and then I received notice that they wanted a professional Brief (or whatever it's called....something like 15 pages long).   I did it, you'll see the professional request for help listed below.   Instead the Appellate would not respond until 5 months after my mom was held unrepresented and not permitted to have assistance in the lower Municipal Court Trial which claimed she must defend herself against a claim which clearly is an impossible claim and the Court was made well aware of this (see court record).  She is over 70 years of age).

 At trial, with my mother was left unrepresented, the Court allowed her no assistance, the judge declares his best judgment, referencing the previous lease, my mother's, stating, 
"The written lease was for a term of 12 months, and provided that the tenancy would continue on a month to month basis ".

Now had a real judge of good character been unswayed from his lofty over-paid position and allowed the evidence into the courtroom, he'd invariably discover that MY RENTAL RECEIPTS SHOW THAT I paid QUARTERLY (for one) and that I was the subsequent tenant and that I gave my 30 day notice a year beyond my mother's lease.   He'd also discover a letter written by the crows themselves in which they state "...DAMAGES WHICH OCCURRED DURING KENNY'S TENANCY". (*I'm Kenny)

The fact is, this was a malicious show of government gone awry, and surely not worth financing.  It is my hopes that the Federal Government will alleviate all the states of their wasteful middle-man facades and make this nation a model nation for the world to emulate (as opposed to the disgust most nations now have toward our crookedness of those that ought have a bit more couth about themselves).
amen!

I'm not an attorney.  I've not even graduated high school.  I should be sorry I don't speak the neo-court's nomenclature?   The perversion of our common colloquial and nationally-known vocabulary is evidenced by the Court's manipulation of the word "intervene" to mean something totally different.

If they are not a court for the citizens then what have the citizens to do with such a scourge?


Motion To Intervene
Request 1 Page 1 Document on Court Record 1st Request Page1  Request 1 Page 2 Document on Court Record 1st Request Page2  Request 1 Page 3 Document on Court Record 1st Request Page 3

Motion To Correct The Record
Request 2 Page 1 Document on Court Record 2nd Request Page 1  Request 2 Page 2 Document on Court Record  2nd Request Page 2  Request 2 Page 3 Document on Court Record 2nd Request Page 3



However the Springfield Ohio Court DID allow a fictitious Lease into the Court Record, submitted by the Crows.
Fraudulent Lease Accepted by Court Evidence The Court's Fraudulent Lease Page1 which was submitted to the Court by the Crows and permitted in the Court Record by the rogue court of "law".

The Real Lease Document Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1
*Although the Landlord unlawfully kept the deposit beyond the legal time-frame, the Court would award even the unlawfully withheld Deposit to the Landlord's Husband (*You heard right, a guy who was not on my mother's lease.  He would be the orchestrator of the SUBSEQUENT LEASE however.  Which makes me the Tenant and if I'm found guilty of damages it's THEN that Mr. Crow and not Theresa Crow as the rightful beneficiary of whatever happened in this disgraceful system of "justice"

Mr. Crow is the winner according to the court, But why?  The Husband wasn't on the lease and only I, my mother, and the landlord (Theresa Crow) were present when mom's lease was agreed upon.   The Lessor's Lease that was submitted and accepted by the Court doesn't even specify anything about a deposit (their incorrect lease also doesn't have the name of the husband on the lease).  However the Landlord does admit (and even make demand for) the deposit, which in of itself proves my mom's authentic lease (the one not allowed by the Court) as being the authentic version (it mentions the deposit in the Landlord's own handwriting right at the bottom of the lease, and no, we are not forgers willing to violate a higher law). 

  So irregardless of who the Court wishes to believe was the tenant is immaterial when the Court has willingly allowed a fictitious Lease, from a fictitious Company (Tec Rentals), neither of which exists.

8.)  Evidences on the Court Record and witnesses were Denied by Judge Thomas Trempe of Springfield Ohio's Clark County Municipal Court, given were the following reasons:

Springfield Ohio Scandal? Denied 1  Clark County Fraud? Denied 2


9. Having been denied twice by the
Clark County Municipal Court  prior to Pre-Trial, I appealed to the Appellate Division 1st submission to the Appellateto request that the decision by the municipal court judge denying my becoming a party to the case be overturned and to allow me to present evidences to show that the allegations are fraudulent and knowingly directed toward the wrong party (both actions being unlawful in every state of our beloved nation). 
The appeal was for a 60(b) motion and was accepted in the Appellate Court on
September 22, 2016.

However the Appellate Court did not perform a 60(b) motion,  and instead allowed the lower court to progress to trial many months later.  With a hush of non-participation by the Appellate Branch of the Judiciary, there was not to be a response by the Appellate until an additional 5 months AFTER the lower court disregarded waiting for the Appellate to come back with an answer to determine whether it was lawful to deny evidence in an ongoing case in which the third party was the only person on the planet that could be proven to be the tenant regarding the exact case being heard in the Court, and furthermore is narrating the actual videos as the disasters were occurring!

Instead, the Appellate,
When the Appellate did respond, it was to this:
Springfield Ohio Document Judicial Farce



Appeal to the Appellate Division 1st submission to the Appellate


Appeal
Springfield Ohio's useless wasteful "Division"

 
Springfield Ohio Clark County Court Document
Decision
as if it were an appeal to the future verdict of the lower Court's illegal Trial, in effect stopping all Appeals to the lower Court Trial altogether; five months later stating the appellate's decision is unappealable.  Shameful waste of space and money, we could get more justice and do better with bums running the court (in my arguably substantiated opinion).


10.)  The Second Appellate Court did not bother to intervene or answer until 5 months A F T E R  the lower Court went ahead with Trial disregarding the motion to the appellate appealing to them to judge between the judgment and the Motioneer (me.  you won't find it in black's legal dictionary), holding my mother un-represented and un-assisted in a fraudulent Claim and Trial.    I would NOT be allowed to present evidences to a case in which I am the obvious correct party to.

It was asked of me, for the 5 minutes I was permitted into the court room,
Q: " Do you have evidence to show the cause for damages ? ". 
Me:  "Why yes, it's right in the back there", as I pointed to the back of the courtroom.  The judge was not even remotely curious enough to want to see the evidences that answer my mother's question of whether or not I had evidence to show her as innocent of the claims against her.  The judge wasn't interested (smug thuggish behavior).

When the Appellate did respond, it was to this disregard:
http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/2/2017/2017-Ohio-2779.pdf

To find out how a Court finds the previous downstairs tenant to pay for the damages caused by the upstairs tenant, click next.

  More of this? >Next





  • 107: Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use

    Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat 2546)