ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW
The Plaintiffs’ Attorney recognizes the third-party Intervenor in its Fair Debt Collection Notice, which
was included in the Motion to Intervene. Why would the Plaintiffs’ Attorney address the Intervenor at
all unless the Intervenor was a subject of interest to be reckoned with?
The Intervenor, himself, brings the issue to the Trial Court before Pre-Trial in two motions
aforementioned. What profit would the Intervenor have to become involved in an issue that would
put the Intervenor potentially in harms way?
The Trial Court erred by allowing an issue to proceed to Trial without first establishing Subject Matter
Jurisdiction. Shouldn’t there be a shred of evidence to proceed through Pre-Trial to validate a Claim
The Trial Court erred when Intervenor presented video evidence that clearly shows live damages being
done to ceiling tiles and flooring from flooding caused by the Plaintiffs’ plumbing from above. Is it
possible to re-create disasters in a building that was vacated about a year before the Plaintiffs filed