Our Nation CAN do Better.
Springfield Ohio, where robbing the elderly is respectable?
Clark County Municipal Court Sham(e)
Springfield's Disgraceful Gang-land Judiciary
The true story starts out like this:
So I created dvd's of the videos, many of which are actually on the court
even though Judge
Trempe denied them in "his" court room.
I got ahead of myself, sorry.
6.) However, a few months after I vacated, a notice came in the mail at my
new residence that I was being threatened by the Crows for a property
damage claim. I replied to the Crows that they were made aware of each and
every disaster that occurred in their property (once I even called at 2am
to inform them of a busted water pipe caused by the frost, a.k.a the
Crow's lack of insulating their plumbing from the cold which resulted in
causing damage to my personal property. Never once did I attempt to get
him to reimburse for the damages).
Videos show where damages came from. It was the upstairs tenant's plumbing
and/or the landlord/plumber's shortcomings in electrical and plumbing
skills, and later an upstairs fire which occurred during my last month
after the walk-through inspection).
The landlord and his agents must go through my downstairs rental in order
to get to plumbing, electrical, air conditioners, etc. which are all
housed in the basement. This is how the landlord's carpets partially were
made to become damaged as shown in the videos that were not
permitted in a court of justus.
were made to bring the Court to reality as seen also on the court record
I was arbitrarily denied to:
A. Become THE (obvious) pertinent party to the case
B. ALL evidences were denied.
Regardless of whether the mud came from the muddy basement or the muddy
upstairs fire, it should not be either the liability of the downstairs
or the former tenant. It shouldn't require a bunch of Judges to figure
this one out, but they actually failed in every respect here.
The "judge" rules that the downstairs PREVIOUS tenant is liable for the
actions derived from the upstairs.
The plot thickens.
Here's where the very first real ceiling damage occurred...I cannot prove that the drugging and raping of the upstairs tenant was caused by Eric and Theresa Crow's son in law (a Champagne County Sheriff) but here's that story for anyone that wants to pursue the matter more:Meet Nicole Crow
, the upstairs neighbor.
6.) Yet a year after I vacated, the Crows sued my Mother instead of me.
I'm over 50 years on this planet and am not prone to lying (here's some of
pertaining to character. Compare my character references
to that of the Clark County Municipal Court that have to censor and delete
hundreds of those in the Public that are voicing their claims against
them. The Court has been in existence for umpteen years but only shows 5
or 7 comments from the Public. Shameful.).
Claimed my 70+ year old mother "caused" the damages
at Eric and
Theresa Crow's property.
7.) The Courts denied my two written requests to become a party to the
Both of my initial requests were submitted and are on Court Record
prior to Pre-Trial.
Yet when Pre-Trial did arrive, my mom's paid attorney James E. Heath of
Ronemous and Heath Bailed. James E. Heath is the head guy at the Bar
Association, if that's not laughable enough). What did James Heath
accomplish? Well after first convincing her to leave the State of Florida
to address a property damage claim that Ohio hasn't even any Jurisdiction
to do, then at Pre-Trial the paid Attorney, slithered from the judge's
chambers to inform her that he would not be able to represent her.
Then the judge emerged to inform her to find another attorney and, oh by
the way, the trial is set for a couple of months later (despite the fact
that I already appealed his prior decision to deny evidence and my person
to become a RIGHTFUL party to the case appealed to the Appellate Division,
submitted promptly after my motions were denied (yet are on the court record
, just as the
physical and URL versions of the videos, photos, etc.).
The motion was submitted to the Appellate Division, stamped as entered,
and then I received notice that they wanted a more professional Brief
(like the one's that a James Heath can write up for a $1,000.00 or more.
The professional brief had to be something like 15 pages long.
But I did it.
I resubmitted a professional brief, though the expectations seemed a bit
alienating as we can't all be fluent in the Legal Nomenclature and
time-frames and fees and stipulations as to how and when and to whom
something should be submitted to the "Honorable" Courts.
Instead the Appellate would not respond until 5 months after my mom was
held unrepresented and without legal assistance in the lower Municipal
Court Trial which claimed she must defend herself against a claim she was
clueless about (if it were not for me she'd no nothing at all of the
She is over 70 years of age (and also not an Attorney).
At trial, with my mother left unrepresented, the Court allowed her no
assistance and I and a witness were forced to remain out in the hallway
during the proceedings.
Then when the judge declares his best judgment, referencing the previous
lease, my mother's, stating,
"The written lease was for a term of 12 months, and provided that the
tenancy would continue on a month to month basis ", there was no month to
month following my mother's one year lease and the Crows know this because
they wrote me the rental receipts .
Now had a real judge of good character been unswayed from his lofty
over-paid position and allowed the evidence into the courtroom, he'd
invariably discover that MY RENTAL RECEIPTS SHOW THAT I paid QUARTERLY
(for one) and that I was the subsequent tenant (hint: rental receipts come
with dates on them),
and that I gave my 30 day notice a year beyond my mother's lease.
He'd also discover a letter written by the crows themselves in which they
state "...DAMAGES WHICH OCCURRED DURING
KENNY'S TENANCY". (*I'm Kenny, my mother is not)
The fact is, this was a malicious show of local government gone awry, and
surely not worth financing. It is my hopes that the Federal Government
will alleviate all the states of their wasteful middle-man facades and
make this nation a model nation for the world to emulate (as opposed to
the disgust most nations now have toward our crookedness of those that
ought to have a bit more couth about themselves).
I'm not an attorney. I've not even graduated high school. I should be
sorry I don't speak the neo-court's nomenclature? The perversion of our
common colloquial and nationally-known vocabulary is evidenced by the
Court's manipulation of the word "intervene" to mean something totally
different. How the hell was that supposed to jump into my drop of the hat
experience in "Civil" Court's Jargon?
If they are not a court for the citizens then what have the citizens to do
with such a scourge?
Okay, I got ahead of myself again....back up, here's the sequence of what
was submitted to the Court. I was clueless that one ought to expose his
entire hand of evidences just to break into Court so the motions were
reserved at first. Here's the first two motions, not much evidence is
attached to these two (of the more than 17 which did include videos,
rental receipts, letters written by the landlord herself, witnesses which
I could produce (easily), my first-person witness account, photos, what
more could the Courts possibly need to see not only an "interest" in the
proceedings, but also the need for the only person that could possibly be
a necessary party to the case?
As a final note, I had to become a party to the case or else I would not
be able to submit evidence in a court of my own accord. If my mother's
attorney didn't quit a few months earlier at Pre-Trial, maybe he'd know
the magic words to get the judge to allow evidence in his dungeon of doom.
To find out how a Court finds the previous downstairs tenant to pay for the damages caused by the upstairs tenant, click next.
More of this?
107: Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone record
s or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of upper-class copyright protections. Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat 2546)