Thanks for Visiting!
Systems by Kenny Hendrick
Be Ye Separate or Die
Made with Trash
Solar Panel Kits
Springfield Ohio Discourse
|Below are personal sentiments at the given moment in time.|
Our Nation CAN do Better.
Springfield Ohio, where robbing the elderly is respectable?
Clark County Municipal Court Sham(e)
Springfield's lack of proper and good Judiciary
The true story starts out like this:
So I created dvd's of the videos, many of which are actually on the court record, however Judge Trempe denied the evidence by denying the only person on the planet most-intimate with the very damages that were the subject of the very claim being heard in his court room.
6.) A few months after I vacated, a notice came in the mail at my new residence that I was being threatened by the Crows for a property damage claim. I replied to the Crows that they were made aware of each and every disaster that occurred in their property (once I even called at 2am to inform them of a busted water pipe caused by the frost, a.k.a the Crow's lack of insulating their plumbing from the cold which resulted in causing damage to my personal property. Never once did I attempt to get him to reimburse for the damages).
Videos show where damages came from. It was the upstairs tenant's plumbing and/or the landlord/plumber's shortcomings in electrical and plumbing skills, and later an upstairs fire which occurred during my last month there (after the walk-through inspection).
The landlord and his agents must go through my downstairs rental in order to get to plumbing, electrical, air conditioners, etc. which are all housed in the basement. This is how the landlord's carpets partially were made to become damaged as shown in the videos that were not permitted in a court of justus.
Numerous attempts were made to bring the Court to reality as seen also on the court record
I was arbitrarily denied to:
A. Become THE (obvious) pertinent party to the case
B. ALL evidences were denied at Trial despite already being included into the Court Record.
Regardless of whether the mud came from the muddy basement or the muddy upstairs fire, it should not be either the liability of the downstairs tenant,
or the former tenant. It shouldn't require a bunch of Judges to figure this one out, but they actually failed in every respect here.
The "judge" rules that the downstairs PREVIOUS tenant is liable for the actions derived from the upstairs.
The plot thickens.
6.) Yet a year after I vacated, the Crows sued my Mother instead of me. I'm over 50 years on this planet and am not prone to lying (here's some of my references pertaining to character. Compare my character references to that of the Clark County Municipal Court that have to censor and delete hundreds of those in the Public that are voicing their claims against them. The Court has been in existence for umpteen years but only shows 5 or 7 comments from the Public).
Suit Claimed my 70+ year old mother "caused" the damages at Eric and Theresa Crow's property.
7.) The Courts denied my two written requests to become a party to the case.
Both of my initial requests were submitted and are on Court Record prior to Pre-Trial.
Yet when Pre-Trial did arrive, my mom's paid attorney James E. Heath of Ronemous and Heath Bailed. James E. Heath is the head guy at the Bar Association(if that's not laughable enough). What did James Heath accomplish? Well after first convincing her to leave the State of Florida to address a property damage claim that Ohio hasn't even any Jurisdiction to do, then at Pre-Trial the paid Attorney, slithered from the judge's chambers to inform her that he would not be able to represent her.
Then the judge emerged to inform her to find another attorney and, oh by the way, the trial is set for a couple of months later (despite the fact that I already appealed his prior decision to deny evidence and my person to become a RIGHTFUL party to the case appealed to the Appellate Division, submitted promptly after my motions were denied (yet are on the court record, just as the physical and URL versions of the videos, photos, etc.).
The motion was submitted to the Appellate Division, stamped as entered, and then I received notice that they wanted a more professional Brief (like the one's that a James Heath can write up for a $1,000.00 or more. The professional brief had to be something like 15 pages long.
But I did it.
I resubmitted a professional brief, though the expectations seemed a bit alienating as we can't all be fluent in the Legal Nomenclature and time-frames and fees and stipulations as to how and when and to whom something should be submitted to the "Honorable" Courts.
Instead the Appellate would not respond until 5 months after my mom was held unrepresented and without legal assistance in the lower Municipal Court Trial which claimed she must defend herself against a claim she was clueless about (if it were not for me she'd no nothing at all of the damages).
She is over 70 years of age (and also not an Attorney).
At trial, with my mother left unrepresented, the Court allowed her no assistance and I and a witness were forced to remain out in the hallway during the proceedings.
Then when the judge declares his best judgment, referencing the previous lease, my mother's, stating,
"The written lease was for a term of 12 months, and provided that the tenancy would continue on a month to month basis ", there was no month to month following my mother's one year lease and the Crows know this because they wrote me the rental receipts.
Now had a real judge of good character been unswayed from his lofty over-paid position and allowed the evidence into the courtroom, he'd invariably discover that MY RENTAL RECEIPTS SHOW THAT I paid QUARTERLY (for one) and that I was the subsequent tenant (hint: rental receipts come with dates on them),
and that I gave my 30 day notice a year beyond my mother's lease.
He'd also discover a letter written by the crows themselves in which they state "...DAMAGES WHICH OCCURRED DURING
KENNY'S TENANCY". (*I'm Kenny, my mother is not)
The fact is, this was a malicious show of local government gone awry, and surely not worth financing. It is my hopes that the Federal Government will alleviate all the states of their wasteful middle-man facades and make this nation a model nation for the world to emulate (as opposed to the disgust most nations now have toward our crookedness of those that ought to have a bit more couth about themselves).
I'm not an attorney. I've not even graduated high school. I should be sorry I don't speak the neo-court's nomenclature? The perversion of our common colloquial and nationally-known vocabulary is evidenced by the Court's manipulation of the word "intervene" to mean something totally different. How the hell was that supposed to jump into my drop of the hat experience in "Civil" Court's Jargon?
If they are not a court for the citizens then what have the citizens to do with such a scourge?
Okay, I got ahead of myself again....back up, here's the sequence of what was submitted to the Court. I was clueless that one ought to expose his entire hand of evidences just to break into Court so the motions were reserved at first. Here's the first two motions, not much evidence is attached to these two (of the more than 17 which did include videos, rental receipts, letters written by the landlord herself, witnesses which I could produce (easily), my first-person witness account, photos, what more could the Courts possibly need to see not only an "interest" in the proceedings, but also the need for the only person that could possibly be a necessary party to the case?
As a final note, I had to become a party to the case or else I would not be able to submit evidence in a court of my own accord. If my mother's attorney didn't quit a few months earlier at Pre-Trial, maybe he'd know the magic words to get the judge to allow evidence in his dungeon of doom.
Video not playing? We can thank monopoly ATandT Internet for scalping the bandwidth. Sorry for the inconvenience. Download video instead.
To find out how a Court finds the previous downstairs tenant to pay for the damages caused by the upstairs tenant, click next.
More of this?
107: Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of upper-class copyright protections. Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat 2546)