Ambush, with a suit for almost
$5,000.00 in damages, Crows took to Court more than two years
beyond my Mother's Lease Agreement had terminated, claiming property
$5,000.00 may not seem so significant until you multiply that
amount by two.
The amount the Crows were suing for is about the same amount as the
Crows obtained from the same Court in their winning suit a few
weeks prior against the upstairs tenant, Nicole
$10,000.00 worth of damages to a property? Both
un-related tenants causing equal amounts of damages to the Crow's
property is possible...just not very probable.
Although I attempted to intervene in
prior to Pre-Trial, the motions were
denied by the Municipal Court Judge.
The woman the Crows were
suing is my mom (I'm 52
years of age); and although we submitted a half-dozen videos,
audio recordings, a slew of documentation and other evidences, as
shown in the
Court's own Record
seen on their website here
all were Denied.
I'm a critical element in this
the Tenant that has evidence that would completely refute the
Crows' Claim, DENIED!
The Security Deposit which
was unlawfully withheld by the Crows for many months beyond the
lawful allowable time frame is with the Court's
consent to the wrongdoing in violation of: 5321.16
(Procedures for Security
Promptly, I appealed the Judge Trempe
decision denying my lawful right
to access the Case in Court to the Second
Appellate Division Court of Appeals
reference to Due Process
, and what's known to me as a
However, the Municipal Court
Trial went on its merry way without thought to the pending Higher
Court Appeal.style="color: rgb(102, 51, 51);">
The Municipal Court failed
to wait for the Decision of the Second Appellate to first test for
legal standing.style="color: rgb(102, 51, 51);">
The Appeal filed September
27, 2016 which, five months after the December Municipal Court Trial
was decided, the Appellate Court concurred (with the lower Court)
stating that my mother never filed an appeal and that I have not shown
interest and have no standing in the case. So more than 10
months to make the decision on May 14, 2017. The Decision
my mom no longer has the ability to appeal (even if she was of the
right state of mind and health).
Just to be clear, the
Plaintiff's Attorney knew aforehand that Margaret Baldino was the
Below are a couple of documents
that would have come out in Court if
to you are two letters which my mother sent over 3 years
Luckily she kept the tracking/shipping
Consider the dates of the letters. Consider the date that the
damages Claim was filed in the Municipal Court against my mother as
being the "cause" for damages.
Document was received by Sheriff Lyons, the Crow's Son-in-Law, on
November 25, 2014
Document was recieved by the Crow Attorney
In Fact, here is a letter from the Plaintiffs themselves in which
they acknowledge Margaret Baldino was NOT at fault and that the
damages did NOT occur during her Lease!!
letters (and more) were communications between the parties before a
suit was ever filed (not against me)...my mother.
style="color: rgb(51, 0, 153);">
have many videos and documents to show other areas in which this local
government has been attacking this family. Here's a
recorded call on youtube
In a few weeks I'll attach a recorded conversation with Mr. James Heath
while in his office.
There's more, much more, so if anyone is interested in those evidences
in other areas, simply ask.
Follow me to the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Ohio, Western Division!
class="signature signature signature signature signature signature c60"
class="signature c74" xml:lang="en-us"
lang="en-us">Misc. Letters From The Court :
Court issues Show Cause Order to Kenny Court issue Show Cause Order to the Crow Attorney