class="c93">
class="c93">
class="c105">
class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="signature signature signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c93">
class="c93">
class="c105">
OKAY THAT'S IT! Let's See how
class="c12">YOU vote now.
class="c84">
class="signature signature c91" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">

class="signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c35">1.) Although the Lower Municipal Court Judge was certifiably cognitive of the Appeal to the Higher Court soon after Pre-Trial, The Municipal Court Judge decided to keep the appointment and have the Trial anyway flinging my trembling mother without the aid of counsel and
class="c108">not waiting on the Appellate Court to Rule on whether or not I have legal standing in the damages claim in the Municipal Court Case. The Appeal was right after Pre-Trial so there can be no misunderstanding of what is being appealed at this stage, even without reading the Appeal:

class="signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us"> appellate/mysubmission.pdf-0.jpg
appellate/mysubmission.pdf-1.jpg


class="c35">2.) Denied evidence in mom's defense which was/is already entered into the Muncipal Court Record well prior to Trial My version http://www.springfield-ohio-post.com, which matches their version: http://images.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/CISWeb/Search.aspx?caseNumber=15CVF02981
class="c84">
class="c91">
class="c143">**My version does not hide the exhibits/evidences. But I'm not entirely done with that page yet so there's more (however what
class="c144">IS
class="c143">complete
class="c144">OUGHT
class="c143">to be enough!)

class="c91">

3.) Denied Court access when that person is with evidence that should have been inter-pleaded, adjoined, intervened, or as an interested party to the Case that is FREE to present evidence to the Case.

4.) Rather, there is bias in that an entirely different party, MR. CROW, as the
class="c33">winner of
class="c12">
class="c41">Mrs. Crow's Contractual Lease Agreement Complaint.

class="c38">*Mr. Crow is a witness at best. How is it legal to give credit to a witness, a person that doesn't have standing and wasn't part of the Lease which was being heard before the Municipal Court, and in dispute? https://www.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/web.nsf/Judgments?ReadForm&CATYPE=Civil&CASENUM=1502981&COUNTNUM=

5.) Again, bias toward Eric Crow, to not be sequestered during Trial.
Whereas the Defense's witnesses were left in the hallway, unlike Eric Crow, in a lease he's not even a signer (signor) nor was he present at the signing of the Lease Agreement
class="c38">(However, the 3rd party Intervenor was present during Margaret Baldino and Theresa's Lease signing ).
class="c145">


class="c147">
class="signature c74" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="signature c74" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">

Narrated by Kenny Hendrick, 3rd-Party Appellant, under
class="c74">Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
class="c74">› TITLE IV. PARTIES

class="c12">and/or any known and unknown laws that exist and still avail the freedom to redress of grievances (off the top of my head),
class="c35">
In reference to the lower Court's Decision to Deny
class="c35">Due Process.
The Appeal is being heard within a
class="c35">60(b) motion at
class="title c91" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Springfield Ohio's Second Appellate Court of Appeals.


class="c108">FOLLOW THE CASE:

class="signature c42" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">The original Clark County Municipal Court Case, from which this Appeal is derived, can be seen Here.
The
class="c41">Municipal Court version (which does NOT show exhibits to the Public) can be seen on
class="c125">their website Here.

class="c150">
class="signature c148" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Note: The Appellate Court appears to be
class="c12">re-directing this issue to reflect Kenneth Hendrick (myself) vs. Eric Crow, et al., including my own mother.
class="signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature c149" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c35">Yet, expressed in my original motion to the Appellate Court
class="c35">in which is stated:

class="signature c149" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c32">That I question the Lawful Judgment of the Springfield Ohio Municipal Court's Judge Trempe to restrict my access to a (then) ongoing case.


class="signature c149" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">


class="signature c152" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c33">Comments?


class="c153">**Note: The courts have banned this website from being viewed within the Court's "secure" Computer System.


class="c153">The website you are presently viewing is blocked after it had already been named within the 3rd Party Appeal to the 2nd District Appellate Court of Appeals itself.


class="c153">Videos and other evidences that were already submitted to the Municipal Court's Record prior, are now blocked from consideration to the higher Court (redacted so that the higher Court, as well as the general public, cannot view the actual exhibits and evidences).

class="c153">
class="c38">Where do I stand?
Justice Demands:class="c88">
class="c38">1.)
class="c155">Reimbursement for that $1,000.00 "attorney" that bailed at pre-trial.
class="c38">class="c88">
class="c38">The critical point in the case, Pre-Trial, and allowed by a Judge during an ex parte meeting where an Attorney emerged to bid farewell to the Aged Defendant, done with the blessing of the Judge here
class="c38">.class="c88"> class="c88">
class="c38">2.)
class="c155">The good name be given back to my mother.class="c88">
class="c38">My mother has NEVER been brought to Court in her over Seventy Years on this planet (that's almost a Century!).
class="c88">
class="c38">3.)
class="c155">Since it is not possible to give back her good name, that which is not tangible, the exact amount the Crows sought is what my mother ought to receive from the Crows.

class="c38">This shame and embarrassment upon my mother, Truth be told, has been the impetus behind her and her husband to now plan for a divorce.class="c88"> class="c88">
class="c38">3.)
class="c155">All Court Costs to be returned and reimbursed back to my mother.

class="c38">Much harm to the otherwise peaceful lives of the Baldino's (and Myself) in court fees and costs, an amount for loss of time/life via altered personal plans to defend oneself against wrongful allegations, paper costs, ink costs, electricity for printers and computers costs, costs to submit various documents to the Court, costs incurred to dub and submit videos to the Court and Plaintiff's Attorney, etc., including an amount to compensate for the undue duress, loss of sleep, loss of appetite, arguments amongst family which were the direct result of this despicable matter at hand (the primary of which is the already mentioned plans for a Divorce, other costs such as postage costs, notary costs, fuel costs, etc.).class="c88"> class="c88">
class="c38">What is wrong is wrong and those that have been wronged ought to be compensated. It's the right thing to do now.class="c88">


Springfield Ohio Letter


I have an issue that was taken against my florida-domiciled ailing elderly mother in a claim stating she was the "cause" for damages that occurred to an Ohio property.


She obtained a paid attorney that never informed her of Jurisdictional issues, and how Ohio has no Jurisdiction over a Person domiciled in Florida (especially when she can show being in Florida when the damages were being recorded by me in Ohio).


So after luring my mother into Ohio Jurisdiction, the attorney wanted her to settle by paying money.


I called repeatedly, I emailed...James Heath did not return any of my communications to him.


It would not be so offensive if James Heath had bailed prior to Pre-Trial, which is a critical juncture in any form of judicial proceedings, yet he did it at Pre-Trial (meeting with the opposing attorney and the Judge; leaving my mom in the hallway).


James Heath emerged to inform my mother that he'd no longer be able to "represent" her.
But who was representing her in that back room? If it were not James Heath than who? Ex-parte meetings are not lawful.

Both sides of the controversy should have been in that "Pre-Trial" meeting (my mother, not being permitted in that meeting exacts never having received common Due Process of a Pre-Trial meeting). If the attorney knew he'd be walking out on Margaret Baldino when he walked into that meeting, then he was not representing Margaret Baldino out in the hallway.


So, as opposed to the attorney Code of Professional Responsibility (as per Ohio Bar's Website), James Heath appears to have
lured the elderly from the Jurisdiction of Florida to Ohio and then promptly jumped ship at a critical juncture in all proceedings, Pre-Trial.

The code of Professional Responsibility used words such as "attorneys are to conduct their business honestly, faithfully, competently, with professional responsibility.

The Bar's website says an attorney is not be with deceit, dishonesty, misrepresentation, conduct fraud, or moral turpitude.

I have contacted thousands of attorneys (mostly via email) in which I attempted to find another attorney for her (me).


The damages she was being sued for had occurred during a period in which I was the tenant

Since James Heath did not mention to the Judge the fact that I had videos and rental receipts and documents which the Plaintiffs wrote validating my claim (signature verified), I was left just like my mother, misrepresented.

I filed two motions to Judge Trempe of the Clark County Muncipal Court stating the Personal Subject Matter Jurisdiction of Margaret Baldino and that I was ready to present the Case to refute the Claim made by the Plaintiffs.

Witnesses, Photos (before, during, and after), Video Evidence (made as the damages were occurring), my Rental Receipts, relevant pertienent Documents (with signature verification before the Claim was ever filed in the Court), my First-Person personal testimony to the acts as they were occurring, and that I wanted to be a party to the case.


My motions were denied stating I am not a plaintiff to the Case.


James Heath failed to represent his client to the best of his abilities if he failed to inform the judge that there was another party to the issue.


The Bar Associations Website uses words such as ethical, and that attorneys are expected to represent their clients to the best of their abilities....to achieve the client goals"




I appealed to the Appellate Court of Appeals in an attempt to get the Clark County Municipal Court's Ruling overturned; to be availed proper Due Process with the opportunity to present the issue claimed against (the wrong party).




The municipal Court did not even wait for the appellate to return with an answer from the Appellate Court of Appeals.


Two months after "Pre-Trial", Judge Trempe ensured the order for the Trial of an elderly woman without counsel and unrepresented, to continue on schedule.





My trembling mother, who has never in her (almost century of) life, been sued; not so much as even a traffic ticket, yet Judge Trempe expected her to know Law (something that takes attorneys years of learning to graduate of).


Her witnesses were left out in the hallway while Margaret Baldino was in a court room to defend herself against the opposing trained Attorney, and the Judge (who is also an Attorney).



When I tried to hold up a rental receipt in court I was waived down by Judge Trempe (in a hushed voice stating "your mother must conduct her own case". I informed the court that I have the videos and that they were in the Court Room, but my mother was expected to know the magic words to compel evidence (the Judge chose not to be unbiased via sheer disinterest).

My mother, who had left to Florida so many months before the damages occurred derived from the upstairs neighbor, was found guilty of being the "cause for damages". Common Credit Card, bills, her part-time employer's statement are verifiable but the Judge was fine with believing a 70+ year old woman could cause damages to ceiling tiles and water damage on carpet.


Five more months after Municipal Court went to trial and found my mother guilty of the damages, five months AFTER the Municipal Court Trial, the Appellate Court of Appeals of the Second District found that they upheld Due Process when they returned to the world with a decision to concur with the Clark County Court.

Videos (their all over youtube, simply search with the words " 1335 North Limestone St. Springfield Ohio ", you know what you don't see in those videos? My mom as being the "cause" for damages.

Rental Receipts (you'll find that I placed them with the Court of Appeals Motion that I submitted to them. Visit my timeling on this present page).

Signature-verified correspondence in which the Plaintiffs state "damages that occurred during Kenny's occupancy" and nothing of my mother as being the cause for damages. Other correspondence between my mother to the Plaintiffs before this suit was ever filed, stating her lease was only one year and was terminated in 2013. The attorney also received that information and it correlates to the signed Lease (that it was a lease for only one year). There's also a letter in which my mother hears of the damages and states she will inform her son, Me. Then came the Claim for $4k++ against my mother in 2015 for being the cause for damages when the Plaintiffs had already made the claim that the damages occurred during Kenny's occupancy.

The Courts don't find that I ought to be a party? I'm over 18, what might be going on in Springfield's Courts?

No evidence was allowed in Court for the unrepresented Margaret Baldino.

Oh, don't presume the Court didn't HAVE the evidences already, they indeed did!

I and my mom worked diligently and submitted over 17 motions consisting of DVD video Evidence, Photos, Signed Documents and other communications, and more.

But on May 14 2017, the appellate decision came back and concurred with the municipal court.

And the upstairs tenant? Oh the genuine cause for the damages was also sued by the Plaintiff for (hold your turkeys) $4k++ a year before my mother. The Plaintiff won, however the upstairs neighbor never showed which means that the Plaintiffs won by default. However the upstairs neighbor isn't going to pay. But that's okay because the Courts found it within Due Process Procedures to allow for a lure and bail intermediary to get someone that might have a dollar.

In other words, they found my mother guilty of damaging ceiling tiles and carpet when I have videos all over the internet (and more that have yet to be posted) that show it's impossible she could be guilty when the water and ceiling tiles on three separate days are falling out of the ceiling onto the carpet below and I'm recording as they fall.




The case is on court record, along with everything we submitted to the Court Record, and can be seen on their website here:
http://images.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/CISWeb/Search.aspx?caseNumber=15CVF02981
My websites (two so far) are here:
springfield-ohio-post.com
springfield-ohio-post.com


Don't think I did not try to get a replacement attorney following James Heath's Professional Conduct, although I don't have a regular income (nothing by the state or any agency and am unemployable without the ability to drive), all avenues for legal aid are full and cannot take any new cases or do not work in the area of law that covers Landlord/Tenant Disputes or are unable to work in the State of Ohio, or don't return a call or email....just like James Heath.


I've contacted thousands of attorneys via email, here and in other states also, here's a smidgin of the attorneys I've contacted during the course of over a year (there's thousands more, literally):

bill.jonesbill.jones@americanbar.org
Alistair McKenzieamckenzie@mckenzielawfirm.com
Amos Jonesjones@amosjoneslawfirm.com
ashleykashleyk@hbsslaw.com
batts_dbatts_d@prepaidlegal.com
baughmannbaughmann@gotofirm.com
bblusteinbblustein@lawmbg.com
blaineblaine@wnc-law.com
bob.personsbob.persons@smithmoorelaw.com
bryanbryan@bryansellslaw.com
bwilsonbwilson@bdlaw.com
Chip Mueslawdayton@gmail.com
cjetercjeter@law.capital.edu
Clarissa Kimmeyclarissa@civilrightscorps.org
clayclay@mccaslinfirm.com
clientadvisorsclientadvisors@gillware.com
contactuscontactus@thejacobslaw.com
contactcontact@civilrightscorps.org
contactcontact@iredalelaw.com
contactcontact@loewyfirm.com
contactcontact@acluohio.org
customer.supportcustomer.support@lexisnexis.com
dana.jonusaitisdana.jonusaitis@americanbar.org
Daniel A. Browndbrown@brownlawdayton.com
dandan@nixalawfirm.com
dbankdbank@law.capital.edu
dbergdberg@bafirm.com
dc.oagdc.oag@dc.gov
dc.outreachdc.outreach@usdoj.gov
dctriallawyersdctriallawyers@tla-dc.org
developmentdevelopment@nita.org
dfsdfs@gsllaw.com
dhaynesdhaynes@cochranfirm.com
dscott2dscott2@law.capital.edu
dwallsdwalls@law.capital.edu
endjatouendjatou@mnlawyerspllc.com
findlaw.prfindlaw.pr@thomsonreuters.com
gorlawgorlaw@f-glaw.com
Governor John Kasichintranet.quorum@governor.ohio.gov
greggreg@gsplaw.net
Hartley Law Officehlo@hartley-lawoffice.com
helphelp@ginsburg-law.com
higginslawsechigginslawsec@bizwoh.rr.com
hwhw@helenwallacelaw.com
infoinfo@mannandmannlaw.com
infoinfo@relmanlaw.com
infoinfo@millermasciola.com
infoinfo@hbadc.org
infoinfo@wclawyers.org
infoinfo@dcnlg.org
infoinfo@browngold.com
infoinfo@schr.org
infoinfo@proseniors.org
infoinfo@lccr.com
infoinfo@nod.org
infoinfo@nationalpartnership.org
infoinfo@legalmomentum.org
infoinfo@kirbylaw.com
infoinfo@kirkland.com
infoinfo@wbez.org
jmulveyjmulvey@cincylawyers.com
john.sturkjohn.sturk@americanbar.org
josephjorgensjosephjorgens@jorgenslaw.com
justicejustice@dcejc.org
jwomackjwomack@slk-law.com
kathykathy@icje.law.uga.edu
kmcastellinikmcastellini@gmail.com
Kourtney R. Selogykrselogy@ohioauditor.gov Law
Clerklawclerk@mwblegal.com
lawlaw@latinojustice.org
legalcliniclegalclinic@law.northwestern.edu
lhofkinlhofkin@employeerightsadvocacy.org
mlevengoodmlevengood@levengoodlaw.com
mmessmmess@law.capital.edu
mmillermmiller@mwblegal.com
moritzlawmoritzlaw@osu.edu
nelahqnelahq@nelahq.org
nljnlj@thenljlawoffices.com
nlopeznlopez@wclawyers.org
ojp.ocomojp.ocom@usdoj.gov
opportunitiesopportunities@clccrul.org
patpat@pcslaw.net
ploplo@peopleslawoffice.com
rachaelrachael@rasmlaw.com
rjanutisrjanutis@law.capital.edu
robert.peckrobert.peck@cclfirm.com
Ryan Searsrs@gertsburglaw.com
sbeemsbeem@law.capital.edu
studentlegalstudentlegal@osu.edu
terry.brooksterry.brooks@americanbar.org
tipstips@abovethelaw.com
tonytony@grecoatlaw.com
trainstrains@slk-law.com
waswas@fbglaw.com
wlcwlc@washlaw.org
ytwissytwiss@law.capital.edu





The following is valid material for scholastic curriculum of an actual ongoing case being heard within the
Springfield Ohio Court of Appeals If you are here to see the actual Appellate Case, jump down to the SEQUENCE OF EVENTS which shows the Court Record.


class="c8">
class="c7">TAKE THE FOLLOWING SHORT QUIZ


class="c13">
class="c10">LET'S SEE WHERE
class="c11">YOU
class="c10">STAND
class="c12">!


class="c16">http://www.springfield-ohio-post.com/federal/clark-county-municipal-court-springfield-Ohio.html


class="c18">Today You Are The Judge
class="c17">


class="c19">
class="c21">
class="c20"> A
class="c20">nswer each short Quiz honestly.
class="c22">
class="c24">
class="c23">Ready For Your First Quiz?

class="signature c26" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Here we go, A CASE IS PRESENTED FOR
class="c25">YOUR REVIEW.


class="c28">
class="c27">You are the higher Court Judge of the Second Appellate Court of Appeals reviewing the Judgement of the Lower Court Judge's Decision in a Landlord/Tenant Dispute in which a 3rd Party has been attempting to "Correct The Record" and "Intervene".
class="c28">The 3rd Party is not a Defendant, nor a Plaintiff; yet the 3rd Party claims to have evidence, and informed the Lower Court that they have a case before them in which the wrong party is being Sued.


class="c28"> The Lower Municipal Court Judge Trempe
class="c28"> Denied the Motions and the Court Entries.

class="c28">
class="c29">This leaves YOU in a precarious situation.

class="c29">The Judge
class="c30">you are reviewing works across the hallway from
class="c30">you
class="c24">
class="signature c31" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Here is the CASE:


class="c35">
class="c32">You are the
class="c33">higher Court Judge that will decide whether or not the
class="c34">lower Municipal Court Judge
class="c33">acted according to the Law, or acted outside of the Law in restricting the 3rd Party Claimant.
class="c24">
class="c36">I will be the 3rd Party Claimant, my name is Kenny Hendrick a.k.a. Kenny Baldino (by error of the landlord).
http://www.springfield-ohio-post.com/federal/fed.htmlRental Reciept

class="c36">I appeal to
class="c30">you in timely fashion (following Pre-Trial of the Lower Court's Decision to Deny me, the 3rd Party, access to the Case). I Appeal to you that I was
class="c37">unlawfully withheld from a Municipal Court's Landlord/Tenant Dispute in which I claim to be a necessary party to the lower Court's Property Damage Claim.
class="c38">

Let's begin.

class="c40">With nothing more to go on Do
class="c30">YOU,
class="c35">
class="c28">Affirm or
class="c8">Overturn the Lower Court's Decision?

class="c28">Affirm = Keep all other parties out of a Court Case

class="c8">Overturn = Allow any party that has evidence to a Court Case

class="c43">


class="signature signature c44" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">_______________________

Quick Test 2

class="signature signature c42" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Now let's step up a notch !

class="signature signature c46" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">YOU
class="c35">will now be availed a bit more information.
class="signature signature c42" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">

class="c35">
class="c47">
class="c12">You are the Court of Appeals Judge. Again, You will decide whether or not my request to become involved in a Landlord/Tenant Dispute Case was unlawfully Denied by the Lower Court Judge.


class="c48">In effect, YOU are a Judge, Judging a Judge.



class="signature signature c42" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">http://springfield-ohio.com
I appeal to you.
class="c51">
class="c42">My claim to you is that I am:

class="signature signature signature signature signature c40" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">1.) A
class="c41">First-Person Witness of the damages that the Landlords were seeking money for in the (then) ongoing Municipal Court Case,
class="c51">
class="c42">My claim to you is that I am:


class="signature signature signature c40" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">2.) In
class="c41">possession of Video/Audio evidence that would refute the Landlord's Claim,

class="c42">My claim to you is that I am:

class="signature signature signature c42" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c28">3.) In
class="c56">possession of documents relevant to the Municipal Court Case,
class="c51">
class="c35">
class="c35">My claim to you is that I was:


class="signature signature signature c42" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c28">4.)
class="c57">The actual tenant
class="c28">
class="c33">during the very time that damages were occurring The Suit was filed completely against the wrong party, a 70+ year old woman that was the former Lease Holder and became domiciled in the State of Florida 2 years prior to the Plaintiff's filing. This last Claim is evidenced by the Crow Letter which is also entered into the Municipal Court Record


class="signature signature signature c40" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">http://springfield-ohio.com/appeals.html
class="signature signature signature c40" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us"><*Side Note: Landlord's use of Tec as a Business Name (which doesn't Legally Exist)


class="c40">With nothing more to go on Do
class="c30">YOU,
class="c35">
class="c28">Affirm or
class="c8">Overturn the Lower Court's Decision?
class="c21">
class="c40">
class="c35">

class="c28">Affirm = Keep all other parties out of a Court Case

class="c8">Overturn = Allow any party that has evidence to a Court Case
class="c35">


class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">_______________________


class="c61">Quick Test 3


class="signature signature c42" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Now let's step up to yet another level ! class="c24">
class="c62">For this next Quiz, you will familiarize yourself with a few paragraphs of Law.
class="c63">

class="c63">

class="c63">
class="signature c63" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">https://www.ohiobar.org/ForPublic/AboutLawyers/Pages/StaticPage-84.aspx
class="signature c65" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">YOU are the Judge of the Second Appellate Court of Appeals.
class="signature c65" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">You will Judge the Lower Court's Judge(ment).
class="signature c65" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">You will either
class="c66">OVERTURN or
class="c67">AFFIRM the lower Court's Decision (to Deny my becoming a part of a Case in which I'm not a party to).
class="signature c65" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
Read the following short paragraphs, and submit your answer following the Quiz.
class="signature c63" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">*******


class="c35">Fed R Civ Rule 24.

class="c41">(a)
class="c70">
class="c69">Intervention of Right. On timely motion,
class="c71">the court must permit anyone to intervene
class="c41">who:
class="c42">

class="c35">
class="c41"> (1) is given an unconditional right to intervene by a federal statute (see
class="signature c74" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us"> TITLE IV. PARTIES
class="c73">);

class="signature c75" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">or
class="signature c74" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c73"> (2)
class="c76">claims an interest
class="c73">relating to the property or transaction
class="c76">that is the subject of the action
class="c73">, and is so situated that disposing of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the movant's ability to protect its interest, unless existing parties adequately represent that interest.
class="c78">
class="signature c75" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">(b)
class="c69">Permissive Intervention. class="c78"> class="c78">
class="signature c75" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us"> (1) In General. On timely motion, the court may permit anyone to intervene who: class="c78"> class="c78">
class="signature c74" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c73"> (A) is given a conditional right to intervene by a federal statute(see
class="signature c74" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">TITLE IV. PARTIES
class="c73">); or class="c78">
class="signature signature c81" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c79"> (B)
class="c80">has a claim or defense that shares with the main action
class="c79">a common question
class="c80">of law or fact
class="c35">.
class="signature signature c81" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">***


class="c42">Fed R Civ Rule 18.
class="signature signature signature c63" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Joinder of Claims
class="signature signature c63" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us"> (a) In General.
class="c33">A party asserting a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim may join, class="c83">
class="signature signature c75" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c33">as independent or
class="c73">alternative claims, as many claims as it has against an opposing party. class="c84">
class="c35">
class="signature signature c75" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us"> (b) Joinder of Contingent Claims. A party may join two claims even though one of them is contingent on the
class="signature signature c75" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">disposition of the other; but the court may grant relief only in accordance with the parties’ relative substantive rights. In particular, a plaintiff may state a claim for money and a claim to set aside a conveyance that is fraudulent as to that plaintiff, without first obtaining a judgment for the money.
class="c22">Rule 19; Required Joinder of Parties


New subdivision (a) defines
style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 204);" class="c33">the persons whose joinder in the action is desirable.
Clause (1)
style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 204);" class="c33">stresses the desirability of joining those persons in whose absence the court would be obliged to grant partial or “hollow” rather than complete relief to the parties before the court
.
style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 204);" class="c33">The interests that are being furthered here are not only those of the parties, but also that of the public in avoiding repeated lawsuits on the same essential subject matter
.
style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 204);" class="c33">Clause (2)(i) recognizes the importance of protecting the person whose joinder is in question against the practical prejudice to him which may arise through a disposition of the action in his absence
. Clause (2)(ii) recognizes the need for considering whether a party may be left, after the adjudication, in a position where a person not joined can subject him to a double or otherwise inconsistent liability. See Reed, supra, 55 Mich.L.Rev. at 330, 338; Note, supra, 65 Harv.L.Rev. at 1052–57; Developments in the Law, supra, 71 Harv.L.Rev. at 881–85.

class="c40">With nothing more to go on Do
class="c30">YOU,
class="c35">
class="c28">Affirm or
class="c8">Overturn the Lower Court's Decision?
class="c21">
class="c40">
class="c35">

class="c28">Affirm = Keep all other parties out of a Court Case

class="c8">Overturn = Allow any party that has evidence to a Court Case
class="c35">


class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">_______________________

Quick Test 4

class="c40">READY FOR THE NEXT TEST?
class="c35">https://www.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/

In this short Quiz, You will need to slow down and consider the evidence that was NOT permitted by the Lower Municipal Court (yet is entered into the Court Record so it cannot be disregarded).


class="c47">Your job as the Higher Court Judge is to decide whether or not the Lower Court acted appropriately in keeping the 3rd Party from presenting a case that might refute the Plaintiffs' Claim.
The 3rd Party (me) Claims that the Lower Court erred in allowing a completely wrong party to be Tried by the Plaintiff.


class="signature signature signature c63" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Let's get you up to speed.
class="signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">As a Higher Court Judge, You must review the Court Record of the Lower Court.

class="c38">Below You will find actual documents that were presented to the Lower Court PRIOR TO PRE-TRIAL.
Presented to you now are One of the Two Motions that the 3rd Party submitted to the Lower Court PRIOR TO PRE-TRIAL.class="c88"> My timely filed
class="c21">MOTION TO INTERVENE
(2 months prior to Pre-Trial)

class="c89">Page1
class="c89">Page2
class="c89">Page3
class="c89">Page4
class="c89"> Exhibit 1
class="c89">Exhibit 2
class="signature signature c90" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">

class="c67">The law does not specify that one must prove him or herself to be included in an ongoing case.
The Law merely states that:


class="c91">Fed R Civ Rule 24.

class="c41">(a)
class="c70">
class="c69">Intervention of Right. On timely motion,
class="c71">the court must permit anyone to intervene
class="c41">who:
class="c42">

class="c35">
class="c41"> (1) is given an unconditional right to intervene by a federal statute (see
class="signature c74" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us"> TITLE IV. PARTIES
class="c73">);

class="signature c75" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">or
class="signature c74" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c73"> (2)
class="c76">claims an interest
class="c73">relating to the property or transaction
class="c76">that is the subject of the action
class="c73">, and is so situated that disposing of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the movant's ability to protect its interest, unless existing parties adequately represent that interest.

class="c40">With nothing more to go on Do
class="c30">YOU,
class="c35">
class="c28">Affirm or
class="c8">Overturn the Lower Court's Decision?
class="c21">
class="c40">
class="c35">

class="c28">Affirm = Keep all other parties out of a Court Case

class="c8">Overturn = Allow any party that has evidence to a Court Case


class="c93">

class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">_______________________


class="c61">Quick Test 5

class="c40">READY FOR THE NEXT TEST? http://www.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/web.nsf/Divisions?OpenForm

class="signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c35">
class="c63">
class="c95">As formerly stated, there were
class="c96">TWO
class="c95">Motions I submitted to the Lower Court Prior to Pre-Trial.

class="c95">Below is the Second Motion which is on Public Court Record.class="c97">
class="c95">Review the Motion, consider the matter, and answer accordingly below. Below is the timely filed MOTION TO CORRECT THE RECORD
(Prior to Pre-Trial)

class="c41">

class="c98">Page1
class="c98"> Page2
class="c98">Page3
class="c98">Page4
class="c98">Page5
class="c98">Page6
class="c98">Page7
class="c98">Page8
class="c98">Page9
class="signature signature c90" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Exhibit Video 1
class="signature signature c90" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">THERE WAS A VIDEO SUBMITTED TO THE COURT RECORD PRIOR TO PRE-TRIAL,

class="signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">DID THE VIDEO AFFECT YOUR JUDGEMENT ? Since the video shows damages to ceiling tiles and carpet, would the video have made a difference in finding that the downstairs tenant is guilty of damages that are clearly the result of the upstairs tenant?

class="c41">

class="c40">With nothing more to go on Do
class="c30">YOU,
class="c35">
class="c28">Affirm or
class="c8">Overturn the Lower Court's Decision?
class="c21">
class="c40">
class="c35">

class="c28">Affirm = Keep all other parties out of a Court Case

class="c8">Overturn = Allow any party that has evidence to a Court Case


class="c93">

class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">_______________________


class="c61">Quick Test 6

class="c40">READY FOR THE NEXT TEST? There is a local Law you should be familiar with. Review this Law and submit your response below.


class="c61"> http://www.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/web.nsf/CaseSearch?OpenForm
class="c61">Ohio Revised Code, Rule 24. Intervention


class="c61">
class="smallcaps">"Intervention of Right. On timely motion, the court
class="c100">must
class="c33">permit
class="c100">anyone to
class="c41">intervene who:

(1) is given an unconditional right to intervene by a Federal Statute (*
class="c74">see Rule 19.
class="c41">Required Joinder of Parties
, et. al.);


class="c41">or

(2)
class="c41">
class="c33">claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action."


class="c41">
class="c32">The following is a letter from the Plaintiff!

class="signature signature signature signature c103" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">http://www.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/web.nsf/DailyScheduleSearch?OpenForm


class="c40">With nothing more to go on Do
class="c30">YOU,

class="c35">
class="c28">Affirm or
class="c8">Overturn the Lower Court's Decision?

class="c28">Affirm = Keep all other parties out of a Court Case

class="c8">Overturn = Allow any party that has evidence to a Court Case
class="signature signature signature signature signature signature c104" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">


class="c105">

class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">_______________________


class="c61">Quick Test 7

class="c40">You've hung in there just fine so far.


class="c42">ARE YOU READY FOR THE NEXT QUIZ?
class="signature signature c91" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Okay, now would it alter your Decision to know that the former Lease Holder with the Plaintiff (Landlord) of the Municipal Court Case,
is my mother?


class="c95">Think about this one for a moment. I'm 52 which makes my mother 70++.class="c97"> class="c97">
class="c95">How does that affect you? Does it affect your Decision?


class="c107">Remember, I'm the 3rd Party Claimant attempting to become a party to the case that is free to present evidence, stating that:

class="c108">1.) The wrong party is being sued.

class="c108">2.) The Plaintiff hasn't any ground to sue.

class="c108">3.) The Plaintiff entered into the Court Record fraudulent Documents.class="c109">
class="c108">4.) That there are videos and witnesses that are able to prove the aforementioned claims made by the 3rd Party.

class="c110">Presented to you are two verifiabe letters which my mother sent over 3 years ago.
Luckily she kept the tracking/sending information.

class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c111">Read the Letters.
Consider the dates of the letters. Consider the date that the damages Claim was filed in the Municipal Court.
http://www.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/web.nsf/RulesPage?OpenFormThis Document was received by Sheriff Lyons, the Plaintiff Crow's Son-in-Law, on November 25, 2014

http://www.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/web.nsf/CostsPage?OpenForm
class="c108">This Document was recieved by the Crow Attorney stating similarly.



class="c40">With nothing more to go on Do
class="c30">YOU,
class="c35">
class="c28">Affirm or
class="c8">Overturn the Lower Court's Decision?

class="c28">Affirm = Keep all other parties out of a Court Case

class="c8">Overturn = Allow any party that has evidence to a Court Case

class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">_______________________

class="signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">


class="c61">Quick Test 8

class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="signature signature signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c93">
class="c93">
class="c105"> class="c141">
class="signature c129" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c108">The original Clark County Municipal Court Case,
class="c141">
class="signature c129" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c108">from which this appeal is derived, can be seen Here. Check it out, there's a world of exhibits and evidences that were denied!


class="c93">
class="c93">
class="c105">
class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="signature signature signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="signature signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">NOTES:
class="signature signature signature c46" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Although a slew of exhibits and evidences were entered into the Municipal Court Record, every one of them were denied
(including videos of the live damages as they were occurring, audio recordings of live narration, relevant documents, witness Testimonies (others), my testimony, etc.). Denied. Not allowed in the Court Case, why?
class="c35">

You are already aware that there were a couple of Motions filed to the Lower Municipal Court Record prior to Pre-Trial, which alleged:


class="c35">
class="c30">1.) The Wrong party was being sued.class="c114">
class="c30">2.) Evidence was NOT permitted in the Municipal Court as seen here: http://springfield-ohio.com

class="c30">3.) That the Claim was fraudulent in the first place, and knowingly filed against the wrong party.
4.)
class="c115">That the Lower Court did not wait for the Court of Appeals' Decision (YOUR DECISION, AND YOU ARE THE HIGHER COURT JUDGE,
class="c61">DENIED!) as to decide upon my right to stand within the Municipal Court Case (to show and tell like neither the Plaintiffs nor the wrongfully maligned Defendant).
class="c35">
class="c30">
Continue below to familiarize yourself with the Live Case you have been tested on.

class="signature signature signature signature c116" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">

class="c61">
class="signature signature c42" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c38">As it stands now, the Municipal Court manipulated a 70+ year old woman to come all the way to Ohio to be told that she's the cause of the damages.

class="c38">Shamefully, the Municipal Court of Springfield Ohio found She was found guilty (while I was denied Court Access to present ANY evidences, even those that were on the Court Record!!!).
class="c61">Denied.

class="signature signature c81" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c117">Eric Crow, the (now) Municipal Court winner, was not a signer (or signor) on
class="c118">
class="c33">any
class="c35">
class="c108">
class="c61"> Lease Agreement, yet seems to have the approval of the Lower Municipal Court concerning
class="c120">standing...
class="c108">in a Lease Agreement in which he's not even named. The Court gave the award to Eric Crow. My contention as the 3rd Party is that
class="c47">if Eric can make a claim against Margaret Baldino in a Lease Agreement dispute that he's not even a party to, then why can I not make a Claim against either of the Crows when I have expressed to the Municipal Court Record to be:

class="signature signature signature signature signature c44" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c95">1.) A
class="c121">First-Person Witness
class="c95">of the damages that the Landlords were seeking money for in the (then) ongoing Municipal Court Case,
class="signature signature signature c122" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">2.) In
class="c41">possession of Video/Audio evidence that would refute the Landlord's Claim,


class="signature signature signature c42" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">3.) In
class="c41">possession of documents relevant to the Municipal Court Case,


class="signature signature signature c42" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">4.)
class="c41">The actual tenant during the very time that damages were occurring (so the Case was filed completely against the wrong party, a 70+ year old woman that was the former Lease Holder). class="c126">
class="c44">Yet, regardless of who was the tenant or which of the Leases the Court was willing to see, Eric Crow is oddly enough shown on the Court Record as being the
class="c125">
class="c33">recipient of the Court award and champion winner of the Theresa Crow / Margaret Baldino Lease (dis)Agreement. In fact, Eric Crow was permitted to be present in the Court Room throughout the entirety of his wife's Contractual Trial; whereas Margaret Baldino's witnesses were told to stay in the hallway until called.

class="c108">My mother and I even went and filed a Counter-Suit against the Crows ($50+ dollars). You guessed it.
Denied (but the Municipal Court kept the money).
class="c126">
class="c127">Lucky Crows?
class="c108">Or something else? http://www.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/web.nsf/HomePage?OpenFormAcknowledgement


class="c129">Last quiz question, it is this:

class="c129">That if I've impressed upon you enough to email your answers to the aforementioned questions. the next question should be a breeze.
class="c129">Read the short Sequence of events below, if you feel this case has unlawfully left the Tenant out of the Tenant/ Landlord Dispute

class="c129">OR

class="c129">
class="c108">if you feel that at very least I should have been a party that is Free to present evidence,
class="c129">
class="c28">then please call the Second Appellate's 800 number and leave a message concerning your opinion of this form of Justice. (800) 608-4652, (937) 225-4464, (937) 496-7724 (fax)
class="c129">
class="c129">Appellate Case Number: 2016-CA-56 to the Municipal Case Number:
class="c93">
class="c93">
class="c105">
class="c93">
class="c93">
class="c105">
id="_caseNumberLabel">15-CVF-02981
class="c93">
class="c93">
class="c105">
class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="signature signature signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c93">
class="c93">
class="c105">

class="c129">Thank you for your time, and enjoy the remainder of this page. P.S. As of May 14, 2017 the Appellate Court agreed with the lower court, that I shouldn't present my evidence because I'm not a party to said action and I have not shown "interest"....

I say, if they didn't give themselves immunity, we'd get a better polity/judiciary that would consider its actions with more sincerity.







style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;">
style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">I have many videos and documents to show other areas in which this local government has been attacking this family. Here's a recorded call on youtube. In a few weeks I'll attach a recorded conversation with Mr. James Heath while in his office.
There's more, much more, so if anyone is interested in those evidences in other areas, simply ask.
Follow me to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division! class="c88">
class="c93">
class="c93">
class="c105">
class="signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="signature signature signature signature signature signature c60" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">
class="c93">
class="c93">
class="c105">
class="c153">CLICK HERE


class="signature c74" xml:lang="en-us" lang="en-us">Misc. Letters From The Court :
Sept-29-2016-court-issued-Page 1 Sept-29-2016-court-issued-Page 2

Court issues Show Cause Order to Kenny Court issue Show Cause Order to the Crow Attorney