Due to the incessant censorship and removal of my web pages due to the new law allowing Police to take down websites without a judicial proceeding, please be patient with my efforts as the son-in-law of the plaintiff in this case is a Sheriff with the power to hinder truth to the public. Springfield Ohio, where robbing the elderly is respectable?
Clark County Municipal Court Sham(e)
Springfield's Disgraceful Gang-land Judiciary
The true story starts out like this:
1.) In 2012, a storm in Florida occurred that caused the ceiling and roof to fall-in leaving me without a place to call home.
2.) The Federal Agency, F.E.M.A., gave me a check to help, but I was still left with nowhere to go for more than 3 months. FEMA
3.) My mother offered to help by signing a one-year lease with Theresa
Crow for a rental located all the way in Ohio at 1335 North Limestone St.
in Springfield Ohio.
Theresa Crow, My Mother, and I met on
location and a lease was signed for one year. Theresa Crow was made fully
aware that I would locate the required identification from the packed 40
foot bus and that the lease would resume in my name. Days later while
unpacking the bus, the identification was located and it was agreed that
the first year lease would resume as written, between my mother and
Theresa Crow and that the subsequent lease would resume in my name
(allowing me time to recoup losses from the Florida storm and get back on
Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1 4.) Following my mother's
lease, I and the husband of the Lessor, Eric Crow, came to an
agreement that I would resume the new lease under new pay arrangements.
Whereas my mother's one-year lease was a monthly lease, mine would be a
5.) Due to electrical deficiencies and
other problems with the rental, approximately one year later I gave notice
to Eric Crow to vacate.
"walk-through" inspection was conducted by Eric Crow and I. (*emphasis
I; can another person
terminate any other person's lease agreement? If so, we'd all be in
trouble, obviously the Lease was in my name).
After the walk-through I was told to fix a
hole that had been made to get electricity into the building and did so
while making a video of the hole repair (and even repaired other areas
which the landlord had not requested also on video).
During the final month of my notice to
vacate came came one disaster after the other. There would be three
sizable leaks from the upstairs tenant and a fire also by the upstairs
tenant. Following many of the repairs the landlord had to
enter my rental to go down to the basement with his plumbers, then the
electrician, etc. He's not the type to wipe his shoes outside as I
would recall once in the umpteen times he frequented the rental (not just
for the rent obviously).
I bothered to make videos showing the true
cause of damages as they were occurring. However, in a crooked court, no
amount of evidence will save us.
As seen on the Court
Record, the Judge denied all evidences, and even
denied the actual tenant/occupant from presenting the Case and evidences
within the Court!
But why would the Clark County Municipal
Court of Ohio lure my mother up from Florida to be intent on finding HER as the cause for damages (she's
well over 70 years old and hundreds of miles away from the Crow Rental)?
The Courts have the videos but after first allowing them on the Court
Record denied them in the Court, have you ever heard of such a sham?
Do you see my mother in this video
compilation causing the damages claimed?
Video not playing? Download video instead.
Neither my mom, nor I, could possibly have been the "cause" for damages to
the Springfield Ohio Property owned by Eric and Theresa Crow.
I began to upload the videos to youtube
(strangely enough, most of the videos were pulled due to "complaints"
having been made against my videos (which merely showed water coming down
from the ceiling and an upstairs fire), then I read the law where the
Police can take down videos and facebook accounts without a judicial
process, the Crow son-in-law is a Sheriff and lives with Mr. and Mrs. Crow
(the Landlord and husband to the landlord).
To counteract the censoring I appealed to
YouTube (about 40 times or so) and then decided to move the videos to
other sites (including Daily Motion, Vimeo, Yandex, and others....still
most of the sites would remove the videos that simply show damages as they
were occurring and nothing more).
So I created dvd's of the videos, many of
which are actually on the court record even though Judge
Trempe denied them in "his" court room.
I got ahead of myself, sorry.
6.) However, a few months after I vacated, a
notice came in the mail at my new residence that I was being threatened by
the Crows for a property damage claim!
I replied to the Crows that they were made aware of each and every
disaster that occurred in their property (once I even called at 2am to
inform them of a busted water pipe caused by the frost, a.k.a the Crow's
lack of insulating their plumbing from the cold which resulted in causing
damage to my personal property. Never once did I attempt to get him
to reimburse for the damages).
Videos show where damages came from. It was
the upstairs tenant's plumbing and/or the landlord/plumber's shortcomings
in electrical and plumbing skills, and later an upstairs fire which
occurred during my last month there ( after
the walk-through inspection).
The landlord and his agents must go through
my downstairs rental in order to get to plumbing, electrical, air
conditioners, etc. which are all housed in the basement. This is how the
landlord's carpets partially were made to become damaged as shown in the
videos that were not
permitted in a court of justus. Numerous
attempts were made to bring the Court to reality as seen also on the
I was arbitrarily denied to:
A. Become THE (obvious) pertinent party to
B. ALL evidences were denied.
Regardless of whether the mud came from the
muddy basement or the muddy upstairs fire, it should not be either the
liability of the downstairs tenant,
former tenant! It shouldn't require a bunch of Judges to figure this
one out, but they actually failed in every respect here.
"judge" rules that the downstairs PREVIOUS tenant is liable for the
actions derived from the upstairs!
The plot thickens.
Here's where the very first real ceiling
damage occurred...I cannot prove that the drugging and raping of the
upstairs tenant was caused by Eric and Theresa Crow's son in law (a
Champagne County Sheriff) but here's that story for anyone that wants to
pursue the matter more: Meet
Nicole Crow, the upstairs neighbor.
6.) Yet a year after I vacated, the Crows sued my Mother instead of me!
I'm over 50 years on this planet and am not prone to lying (here's some of
references pertaining to character. Compare my character
references to that of the Clark County Municipal Court that have to censor
and delete hundreds of those in the Public that are voicing their claims
against them. The Court has been in existence for umpteen
years but only shows 5 or 7 comments from the Public. Shameful.).
7.) The Courts denied my two written requests to become a party to the
Both of my initial requests were
submitted and are on Court Record prior
Yet when Pre-Trial did arrive, my mom's paid
attorney James E. Heath of Ronemous and Heath Bailed! James E.
Heath is the head guy at the Bar Association, if that's not laughable
enough). What did James Heath accomplish? Well after first
convincing her to leave the State of Florida to address a property
damage claim that Ohio hasn't even any Jurisdiction to do, then at
Pre-Trial the paid Attorney, slithered from the judge's chambers to
inform her that he would not be able to represent her.
Then the judge emerged to inform her to find another attorney and, oh
by the way, the trial is set for a couple of months later (despite the
fact that I already appealed his prior decision to deny evidence and my
person to become a RIGHTFUL party to the case appealed to the Appellate
Division, submitted promptly after my motions were denied (yet are on
the court record, just as the
physical and URL versions of the videos, photos, etc.).
The motion was submitted to the Appellate Division, stamped as entered,
and then I received notice that they wanted a more professional Brief
(like the one's that a James Heath can write up for a $1,000.00 or
more. The professional brief had to be something like 15
But I did it.
I resubmitted a professional brief, though the expectations seemed a
bit alienating as we can't all be fluent in the Legal Nomenclature and
time-frames and fees and stipulations as to how and when and to whom
something should be submitted to the "Honorable" Courts.
Instead the Appellate would not respond until 5 months after my mom was
held unrepresented and without legal assistance in the lower Municipal
Court Trial which claimed she must defend herself against a claim she
was clueless about (if it were not for me she'd no nothing at all of the
She is over 70 years of age (and also not an Attorney).
At trial, with my mother left unrepresented, the Court allowed her no
assistance and I and a witness were forced to remain out in the hallway
during the proceedings.
Then when the judge declares his best
judgment, referencing the previous lease, my mother's, stating,
"The written lease was for a term of 12 months, and provided that the
tenancy would continue on a month to month basis ".
(Heeeeellllllloooooooo, there was no month to month following my mother's
one year lease and the Crows know this because they wrote me the rental
Now had a real judge of good character been unswayed from his lofty
over-paid position and allowed the evidence into the courtroom, he'd
invariably discover that MY RENTAL RECEIPTS SHOW THAT I paid QUARTERLY
(for one) and that I was the subsequent tenant (hint: rental receipts come
with dates on them),
and that I gave my 30 day notice a year
beyond my mother's lease.
He'd also discover a letter written by the
crows themselves in which they state "...DAMAGES WHICH OCCURRED DURING KENNY'S
TENANCY". (*I'm Kenny, my mother is not)
The fact is, this was a malicious show of local government gone awry, and
surely not worth financing. It is my hopes that the Federal Government
will alleviate all the states of their wasteful middle-man facades and
make this nation a model nation for the world to emulate (as opposed to
the disgust most nations now have toward our crookedness of those that
ought to have a bit more couth about themselves).
I'm not an attorney.
I've not even graduated high school.
I should be sorry I don't speak the
neo-court's nomenclature? The perversion of our common colloquial and
nationally-known vocabulary is evidenced by the Court's manipulation of
the word "intervene" to mean something totally different. How the
hell was that supposed to jump into my drop of the hat experience in
"Civil" Court's Jargon?
If they are not a court for the citizens then what have the citizens to do
with such a scourge?
Okay, I got ahead of myself again....back
up, here's the sequence of what was submitted to the Court. I was
clueless that one ought to expose his entire hand of evidences just to
break into Court so the motions were reserved at first. Here's the
first two motions, not much evidence is attached to these two (of the more
than 17 which did include videos, rental receipts, letters written by the
landlord herself, witnesses which I could produce (easily), my
first-person witness account, photos, what more could the Courts possibly
need to see not only an "interest" in the proceedings, but also the need
for the only person that could possibly be a necessary party to the case?
As a final note, I had to become a party to
the case or else I would not be able to submit evidence in a court of my
own accord. If my mother's attorney didn't quit a few months earlier
at Pre-Trial, maybe he'd know the magic words to get the judge to allow
evidence in his dungeon of doom.
Then when it was taking so long for an
answer from the lower court judge of my mother's case, Judge Thomas
Trempe, I then submitted another motion and creatively titled this one:
Motion to Correct the Record
At about Pre-Trial, my motions were denied. However the
Springfield Ohio Court DID go to great efforts to allow a
fictitious Lease into the Court
Record, submitted by the Crows. Notice their Lease which
they submitted to the Courts doesn't mention a word about the Security
Deposit which my mother's Lease does. Notice also that the Lease
shows my mother and Theresa Crow are the only signors on the Lease (yet
the Court would award the bounty to someone who wasn't even on her Lease),
Notice later down this page that all parties agree that there indeed was a
security deposit and that although it was withheld beyond the legal
time-frame, that's A-Okay with the JUSTus system. Notice below also
that there is the matter of a fictitious company name that nobody on
planet earth will find as a valid entity is none-other than the Crows
themselves, that was also allowed in a Court of "Law".
There's more, hang in there, I'm just
getting started here.
*Although the Landlord unlawfully kept the
deposit beyond the legal time-frame, the Court would award even the
unlawfully withheld Deposit to the Landlord's Husband
(*You heard right, a guy who was not even
on my mother's lease).
Mr. Crow was however the orchestrator of
the SUBSEQUENT LEASE with me but according to the Court's best judgment I
have "no standing".
Mr. Crow is the winner according to the court, But why?
The Husband clearly wasn't on the lease but
later down this page you will see the judges (yes, plural) lie and state
that the case is against my mother and both Crows.
The only people present the day of my
mother's Lease having been signed is I, my mother, and the landlord
(Theresa Crow) only (which is why Mr. Crow's signature is nowhere to be
found even though the court's elude to the exact opposite of the
documented factual scenario).
However the Crows do admit
(and even make demand for) the deposit which they've already held
beyond the legal allowable time-frame (no worries, the judge apparently
plays a biased blind when it's convenient).
irregardless of who the Court wishes to believe was the tenant is
immaterial when the Court has willingly allowed a fictitious Lease, from
a fictitious Company (Tec Rentals), neither of which exists in the real
8.) Evidences on the Court Record and witnesses
were Denied by Judge Thomas Trempe of Springfield Ohio's Clark County
Municipal Court, given were the following reasons:
9. Having been denied twice by the Clark County Municipal Court prior
to Pre-Trial, and having been denied what I though was a basic right to
present evidences (plural), I appealed to the Appellate Division
The thing is, if you go to their Court Record, you will find
more than enough evidences ALREADY submitted to the Court. I wasn't
aware that I was supposed to produce every shred of evidence and reveal my
whole hand (my expectation was to see the look on everybody's faces when
the true liar in the Court was exposed!).
Further, if live videos sent to the court
and obviously accepted and stamped into the record are already in
the Court's possession, one might think that it gives a hint to some
plausible need for my being required to be in that Case for
damages. The Court also accepted and stamped into Court Record the copy of my
rental receipts and much more, this is not (to quote the Appellate
Decision), "unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable."?
Instead they wait till there can be no
appeal on my mother's case to finally respond with this crap:
"we cannot reverse unless the trial court's
unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable. Merrill at ¶ 41. "
Just to be clear, I appealed the decision
made by a lower court judge that mandated that evidence and T H
E tenant out of the tenant / landlord dispute.
I appealed to request that the decision by
the municipal court judge denying my becoming a party to the case be
overturned and to allow me to present evidences to show that the
allegations are fraudulent and knowingly directed toward the wrong party
(both actions being unlawful in every state of our beloved nation).
The appeal was for a 60(b) motion and was accepted in the Appellate Court
on September 22, 2016.
However the Appellate Court did not perform a 60(b) motion, and instead
allowed the lower court to progress to trial many months later.
In case you're missing the hypocrisy in all
this, If I appeal that I ought to be a party to the case and offer video
evidence and rental receipts and more along with that appeal (look at
their Court Record to see for
yourself), then what good is the Appellate Court if it's going to not even
consider my pleading? They did not respond till months and
months later AFTER the trial (so even if they said "whoops" yes, Kenny is
the obvious party that needs to be included here, it was too late 5 months
after they responded (not counting the months from which I submitted the
appeal to them!).
With a hush of non-participation by the
Appellate Branch of the Judiciary, there was not to be a response by the
Appellate until an additional 5 months AFTER the lower court disregarded
waiting for the Appellate to come back with an answer to determine whether
it was lawful to deny evidence in an ongoing case in which the third party
was the only person on the planet that could be proven to be the tenant
regarding the exact case being heard in the Court, and furthermore is
narrating the actual videos as the disasters were occurring!
We need more educated people in our Courts
maybe, less thuggish and more for the people (because if they aren't for
us we need to plead with the Federal Government to get rid of the middle
men profiteers that serve no good purpose thereby allowing more profit to
go to the Federal Government in the fashion of ONE Government, ONE
universal law throughout the States and without the leaches). Amen.
as if it were an appeal to the future verdict of the lower Court's
illegal Trial, in effect stopping all Appeals to the lower Court Trial
altogether; five months later stating the appellate's decision is
unappealable. Shameful waste of space and money, we could get more justice
and do better with bums running the Clark County Municipal Court (in my
arguably substantiated opinion).
10.) The Second Appellate Court did not bother to intervene or answer
until 5 months A F T E R the lower Court went ahead with Trial
disregarding the motion to the appellate appealing to them to judge
between the judgment and the Motioneer (me. you won't find it in black's
legal dictionary), holding my mother un-represented and un-assisted in a
fraudulent Claim and Trial. I would NOT be allowed to present evidences to
a case in which I am the obvious correct party to.
It was asked of me, for the 5 minutes I was permitted into the court room,
Q: " Do you have evidence to show the cause for damages ? ".
Me: "Why yes, it's right in the back there", as I pointed to the back of
the courtroom. The judge was not even remotely curious enough to want to
see the evidences that answer my mother's question of whether or not I had
evidence to show her as innocent of the claims against her. The judge
wasn't interested (smug thuggish behavior).
When the Appellate did respond, it was to
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a
copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone
records or by any
other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for
classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of
upper-class copyright protections. Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat