Thanks for Visiting!
Systems by Kenny Hendrick
Made with Trash
Solar Panel Kits
Springfield Ohio Discourse
|Below are personal sentiments at the given moment in time.
Of oddities, I'll list a few herein.
Video not playing? Download video instead.
Did that conversation not sound strange to you?
1.) Passport Denied.
Of all the videos that Youtube has censored (upward to a hundred, even those entirely created by myself and containing no industry protections of "copyright" material), still what makes this video so amazing to me, is simply that it is still online!
2.) Denied a Home Business.
Initially my 73 year old mother met with George Degenhart, the German Township Codes Enforcer, and stated her son's intents (I'm her son), She inquired as to what the requirements were for a home-based business. She was told by the Codes Enforcement Officer that there were no requirements and that her son (me) ought to do as him and his wife, put up a sign for a period as specified allowable (45days), and that following the allowable time-frame, take the sign down for a week, after which it would be able to be re-erected for another allowable term and that he was not going to be religiously checking on the sign anyway. He simply stated to keep the home-based business low-key. Three days after I moved in, the sign went up. Two days later we were being threatened for $100.00 per day forfeiture and criminal proceedings!
3.) Denied a Federally approved Mailbox.
Since I was being threatened against having the lawful sign and home-based business, it was decided to succumb to the manipulation and take the sign down.
However, so that friends, family, and past customers can locate the property (now that a sign was not being permitted), a mailbox was clad and constructed to appear as a computer and checked at the USPS.com website and the carrier as to it having been approved.
This mailbox was verified as lawful by the Federal United States Postal Service, but the German Township Codes Compliance Officer made the request that the mailbox (no reason given) should be removed.
Shortly after, two O.D.O.T. trucks under police escort were recorded in a mailbox drive-by. There is another vehicle between the O.D.O.T. trucks and the police officer's car. No comment on that vehicle, since a viewer's claim cannot be verified.
Video not playing? Download video instead.
4.) "Numerous" Complaints"
Within a couple of weeks of having moved to the property in the German Township of Springfield Ohio, the Codes Department stated there were "numerous complaints" against me. Those "numerous" complaints melted down to a solitary complaint, and then ended up being one very QUESTIONABLE unverifiable "complaint".
Since the data anyone would need to be able to verify the complaint as authentic is completely redacted out with a marker, It is not known if the arguably unlawful redacting was made by the German Township, or the Clark County Prosecutor.
Wouldn't anyone find that unnecesarily antagonistic? Imagine being told that someone made a complaint against you but no person can be verified as having done so. This in of itself should be a clear indication that the "system" is not good. Taking it a step further, our Nation now indulges in FISA Courts (where the defendant is not permitted legal representation, nor is the defendant permitted to speak on his or her behalf). We should be ashamed of ourselves as a nation to have let this caveman-style dictatorial polity to baske in such myopia. The way to a faithful, cheerful citizenry is not to oppress and rob them! And when the damage begins, it's damn-hard to recoupe the minds and souls of the masses back to prideful, trustworthy, faithful, production.
5.) Initially, I immediately made numerous requests for the copies of the "numerous" complaints against me. All were either ignored, in violation of FOIA (freedom of information act), FOIL (Freedom of information law), the "Sunshine Law" (seriously), or whatever they're calling being open and honest this year. However one time, prior to finally sending the redacted questionable complaint, the D.A. of Clark County in Springfield Ohio responded by sending incorrect Case Law of an irrelevant use of restricting common information. In fact, the case law the D.A. sent was more in bolstering my claim for information as being allowable by law (the case law he sent to me showed redacting/obfuscating was permissable only when an underage child was involved.
Unless an underage child made the solitary (aka numerous) complaint(s) against me, then it's lawful to be honest and open and I ought to be permitted to know and address the accuser (Was the accuser a neighbor (no. I recorded conversations with the neighbors on both sides of me and two houses to the north). The Codes Department stated it was my neighbors that made the complaints (which ended up being only one ... there seems to be the making of a pattern offender here. Is the accuser real at all? If the complaintant was underage, is it lawful for an underage person to file a complaint? And if so, at what age do they become enforcable? Should a six-year old be the impetus behind the Codes Department's enforcement? Since none of my immediate neighbors have underage children in their houses, how do we know this entire attack is not conjured up and unwarranted by the same entity that told the apparent misinformation claiming my neighbors at the root of the evil?
style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 0, 0);">
6.) What would we do without cameras in a political crime-clime such as this?
Video not playing? Download video instead.
Misc. Notes concerning the simple request to address the allegation(s) against me:
In violation of the "Sunshine Law" a.k.a. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), a.k.a. Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), the repeated requests for information consisting of the “complaints” being waged against me had been arrogantly and antagonistically either ignored or responded with nonsense codes and law from un-related other areas including child-protection laws.
Initially those that receive money from us via taxation, fees, fines, licenses, etc. had stated that the numerous complaints against me were coming from my neighbors.
I took the initiative to record the conversations with each of the neighbors within 300 yards of my location. Apparently another official has fabricated a lie, and as of a few months ago my petition can be found on the USGov Site to join the signatures of tens of thousands of others that have also signed, giving reasons that are valid, to repeal the immunity clause for government officials regardless of whether or not they are proven to be abusive of their privileges for personal gain or otherwise.
After much ado, whether authentic or not, only one solitary REDACTED document was sent in response to my legal request. That solitary complaint was illegally REDACTED and made of no avail. In other words, they sent a paper with black marker through the information so that one would not even be able to ascertain whether the "complaint" was real at all. Is this what the workers are programmed to do? Violate our National law without fear of criminal proceedings against themselves (immunity clauses, once repealed, could cause a great many to pay dearly for their thoughtless error in mindless chain of command mentality).
George Degenhart works for the German Township in Springfield Ohio as a Codes Enforcer, he hasn't any legal right to threaten people
exploitation by means of threats, of causing harm through utilizing criminal proceedings, monetary forfeitures, investigations, or other intrusions via mail, telephone, etc.
George Degenhart is an Codes Enforcer and has limited functions.
To make matters worse, the very inspector is the one that is guilty of the very things he's accused me of. 1.) He and his wife were/are running an illegitimate business 2.) The business is being operated out of their detached garage
a home-based business must be from within the living space itself and cannot be a detached building, according to his own codes book 3.) The Degenhart's had/have a sign for their illegitimate business right above the garage door yet a sign permit could not be found. verb: Racketeering definition: Often associated with organized crime, is the act of offering of a dishonest service (a "racket") to solve a problem that wouldn't otherwise exist without the enterprise offering the service.
Racketeering as defined by the RICO act includes a list of 35 crimes.
elaborate topic below
Advised to change the color of the lights (* inside the home)
(no, it's not the mobsters, the mexicans, chinese, iraq, iran or afghanistan, it's not the Russians, Japanese, Vietnamese, libya, It's not Laos or Cuba .... and we dare not call it what it is: manipulation, coercion, extortion, racketeering, profiteeering, etc. "Our" Government (LLC).
2803 Troy Road Springfield Ohio Product of USA
+1 (937) 718-3586
THE OTHER SIDE OF POLITICS