2.) Denied a Home
Business. Initially my 73 year old mother met with George Degenhart, the
German Township Codes Enforcer, and stated her son's intents (I'm her
son), She inquired as to what the requirements were for a home-based
business. She was told by the Codes Enforcement Officer that there were
no requirements and that her son (me) ought to do as him and his wife,
put up a sign for a period as specified allowable (45days), and that
following the allowable time-frame, take the sign down for a week, after
which it would be able to be re-erected for another allowable term and
that he was not going to be religiously checking on the sign anyway. He
simply stated to keep the home-based business low-key. Three days after
I moved in, the sign went up. Two days later we were being threatened
for $100.00 per day forfeiture and criminal proceedings!
3.) Since I was being
threatened against having the lawful sign and home-based business, it
was decided to succumb to the manipulation and take the sign down.
However, so that friends, family, and past customers can locate the
property (now that a sign was not being permitted), a mailbox was clad
to appear as a computer. This mailbox was verified as lawful by the
Federal United States Postal Service but the German Township Codes
Compliance Officer made the request to remove the mailbox (no reason
given). Shortly after, two O.D.O.T. trucks under police escort were
recorded in a mailbox drive-by. There is another vehicle between the
O.D.O.T. trucks and the police officer's car. No comment on that vehicle
since it cannot be verified as to the owner.
4.) Within a couple
of weeks of having moved to the property in the German Township of
Springfield Ohio, the Codes Department stated there were "numerous
complaints" against me. Those "numerous" complaints melted down to a
solitary complaint and ended up being one very QUESTIONABLE unverifiable
"complaint" since the data anyone would need to be able to verify the
complaint as authentic is completely redacted out with a marker. It is
not known if the arguably unlawful redacting was made by the German
Township or the Clark County Prosecutor - wouldn't anyone find that
coming to you and saying your under arrest because some person that you
will never know made a complaint against you....how would you know the
claim was even real? By all appearances, the complaint itself isn't even
real (and certainly cannot be determined for authenticity since there's
marker through all the relevant data).
5.) Initially, I
immediately made numerous requests for the copies of the "numerous"
complaints against me. All were either ignored, in violation of FOIA
(freedom of information act), FOIL (Freedom of information law), the
"Sunshine Law" (seriously), or whatever they're calling being open and
honest this year.
However one time,
prior to finally sending the redacted questionable complaint, the D.A.
of Clark County in Springfield Ohio responded by sending incorrect Case
Law of an irrelevant use of restricting common information. In fact, the
case law the D.A. sent was more in bolstering my claim for information
as being allowable by law (the case law he sent to me showed
redacting/obfuscating was permissable only when an underage child was
Unless an underage
child made the solitary (aka numerous) complaint(s) against me, then
it's lawful to be honest and open and I ought to be permitted to know
and address the accuser (Was the accuser a neighbor (no. I recorded
conversations with the neighbors on both sides of me and two houses to
the north). The Codes Department stated it was my neighbors that made
the complaints (which ended up being only one ... there seems to be the
making of a pattern offender here. Is the accuser real at all? If the
complaintant was underage, is it lawful for an underage person to file a
complaint? And if so, at what age do they become enforcable? Should a
six-year old be the impetus behind the Codes Department's enforcement?
Since none of my immediate neighbors have underage children in their
houses, how do we know this entire attack is not conjured up and
unwarranted by the same entity that told the apparent misinformation
claiming my neighbors at the root of the evil?
6.) What would we do
without cameras in a political crime-clime such as this?
Misc. Notes concerning the simple request
to address the allegation(s) against me:
In violation of the "Sunshine Law" a.k.a. Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA), a.k.a. Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), the repeated requests
for information consisting of the “complaints” being waged against me
had been arrogantly and antagonistically either ignored or responded
with nonsense codes and law from un-related other areas including
that receive money from us via taxation, fees, fines, licenses, etc.
had stated that the numerous complaints against me were coming from my
neighbors. I took the initiative to record the
conversations with each of the neighbors within 300 yards of my
location. Apparently another official has fabricated a lie,
and as of a few months ago my petition can be found on the USGov Site to
join the signatures of tens of thousands of others that have also
signed, giving reasons that are valid, to repeal the immunity clause for
government officials regardless of whether or not they are proven to be
abusive of their privileges for personal gain or otherwise.
After much ado, whether authentic or not, only one solitary REDACTED
document was sent in response to my legal request. That solitary
complaint was illegally REDACTED and made of no avail. In other words,
they sent a paper with black marker through the information so that one
would not even be able to ascertain whether the "complaint" was real at
all. Is this what the workers are programmed to do? Violate our National
law without fear of criminal proceedings against themselves (immunity
clauses, once repealed, could cause a great many to pay dearly for their
thoughtless error in mindless chain of command mentality).
George Degenhart works for the German Township in Springfield Ohio as a
Codes Enforcer, he hasn't any legal right to threaten people
exploitation by means of threats, of causing harm through utilizing
criminal proceedings, monetary forfeitures, investigations, or other
intrusions via mail, telephone, etc.
George Degenhart is an Codes Enforcer and has limited functions.
To make matters worse, the very inspector is the one that is guilty of
the very things he's accused me of.
1.) He and his wife were/are running an illegitimate business
2.) The business is being operated out of their detached garage
a home-based business must be from within the living space itself and
cannot be a detached building, according to his own codes book
3.) The Degenhart's had/have a sign for their illegitimate business
right above the garage door
yet a sign permit could not be found.
definition: Often associated with organized crime, is the act of
offering of a dishonest service (a "racket") to solve a problem that
wouldn't otherwise exist without the enterprise offering the service.
Racketeering as defined by the RICO act includes a list of 35 crimes.
elaborate topic below
Advised to change the
color of the lights (*inside
(no, it's not the mobsters, the mexicans, chinese, iraq, iran or
afghanistan, it's not the Russians, Japanese, Vietnamese, libya, It's not
Laos or Cuba .... and we dare not call it what it is: manipulation,
coercion, extortion, racketeering, profiteeering, etc. "Our" Government