2.) Denied a Home
Business. Initially my 73 year old mother met with George
Degenhart, the German Township Codes Enforcer, and stated her son's
intents (I'm her son), She inquired as to what the requirements were
for a home-based business. She was told by the Codes
Enforcement Officer that there were no requirements and that her son (me)
ought to do as him and his wife, put up a sign for a period as specified
allowable (45days), and that following the allowable time-frame, take the
sign down for a week, after which it would be able to be re-erected for
another allowable term and that he was not going to be religiously
checking on the sign anyway. He simply stated to keep the home-based
business low-key. Three days after I moved in, the sign went
up. Two days later we were being threatened for $100.00 per day
forfeiture and criminal proceedings!
3.) Since I was being
threatened against having the lawful sign and home-based business, it was
decided to succumb to the manipulation and take the sign down.
However, so that friends, family, and past customers can locate the
property (now that a sign was not being permitted), a mailbox was clad to
appear as a computer. This mailbox was verified as lawful by the
Federal United States Postal Service but the German Township Codes
Compliance Officer made the request to remove the mailbox (no reason
given). Shortly after, two O.D.O.T. trucks under police
escort were recorded in a mailbox drive-by. There is another
vehicle between the O.D.O.T. trucks and the police officer's car. No
comment on that vehicle since it cannot be verified as to the owner.
4.) Within a
couple of weeks of having moved to the property in the German Township of
Springfield Ohio, the Codes Department stated there were "numerous
complaints" against me. Those "numerous" complaints melted down to
a solitary complaint and ended up being one very QUESTIONABLE unverifiable
"complaint" since the data anyone would need to be able to verify the
complaint as authentic is completely redacted out with a marker. It
is not known if the arguably unlawful redacting was made by the German
Township or the Clark County Prosecutor - wouldn't anyone find that
Imagine someone coming
to you and saying your under arrest because some person that you will
never know made a complaint against you....how would you know the claim
was even real? By all appearances, the complaint itself isn't
even real (and certainly cannot be determined for authenticity since
there's marker through all the relevant data).
5.) Initially, I
immediately made numerous requests for the copies of the "numerous"
complaints against me. All were either ignored, in violation of FOIA
(freedom of information act), FOIL (Freedom of information law), the
"Sunshine Law" (seriously), or whatever they're calling being open
and honest this year.
However one time, prior
to finally sending the redacted questionable complaint, the D.A. of Clark
County in Springfield Ohio responded by sending incorrect Case Law of an
irrelevant use of restricting common information. In fact, the case
law the D.A. sent was more in bolstering my claim for information as being
allowable by law (the case law he sent to me showed redacting/obfuscating
was permissable only when an underage child was involved.
Unless an underage
child made the solitary (aka numerous) complaint(s) against me, then it's
lawful to be honest and open and I ought to be permitted to know and
address the accuser (Was the accuser a neighbor (no. I recorded
conversations with the neighbors on both sides of me and two houses to the
north). The Codes Department stated it was my neighbors that made
the complaints (which ended up being only one ... there seems to be the
making of a pattern offender here. Is the accuser real at all?
If the complaintant was underage, is it lawful for an underage person to
file a complaint? And if so, at what age do they become
enforcable? Should a six-year old be the impetus behind the
Codes Department's enforcement? Since none of my immediate
neighbors have underage children in their houses, how do we know this
entire attack is not conjured up and unwarranted by the same entity that
told the apparent misinformation claiming my neighbors at the root of the
6.) What would we
do without cameras in a political crime-clime such as this?
Misc. Notes concerning the simple request
to address the allegation(s) against me:
In violation of the "Sunshine Law" a.k.a. Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA), a.k.a. Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), the repeated
requests for information consisting of the “complaints” being waged
against me had been arrogantly and antagonistically either ignored or
responded with nonsense codes and law from un-related other areas
including child-protection laws.
that receive money from us via taxation, fees, fines, licenses, etc. had
stated that the numerous complaints against me were coming from my
neighbors. I took the initiative to record the
conversations with each of the neighbors within 300 yards of my
location. Apparently another official has fabricated a lie,
and as of a few months ago my petition can be found on the USGov Site to
join the signatures of tens of thousands of others that have also signed,
giving reasons that are valid, to repeal the immunity clause for
government officials regardless of whether or not they are proven to be
abusive of their privileges for personal gain or
After much ado, whether authentic or not, only one solitary REDACTED
document was sent in response to my legal
request. That solitary complaint was
illegally REDACTED and made of no avail. In other words, they
sent a paper with black marker through the information so that one would
not even be able to ascertain whether the "complaint" was real at
all. Is this what the workers are programmed to do? Violate
our National law without fear of criminal proceedings against themselves
(immunity clauses, once repealed, could cause a great many to pay dearly
for their thoughtless error in mindless chain of command mentality).
George Degenhart works for the German Township in Springfield Ohio as a
Codes Enforcer, he hasn't any legal right to threaten people
by means of threats, of causing harm through utilizing criminal proceedings,
monetary forfietures, investigations, or other intrusions via mail,
George Degenhart is an Codes Enforcer and has limited
To make matters worse, the very inspector is the one that is
guilty of the very things he's accused me of.
1.) He and his wife were/are running an illegitimate business
2.) The business is being operated out of their detached garage
home-based business must be from within the living space itself and cannot
be a detached building, according to his own codes book
3.) The Degenhart's had/have a sign for their illegitimate
business right above the garage door
yet a sign permit could not be
definition: Often associated with organized crime, is the act of
offering of a dishonest service (a "racket") to solve a problem that
wouldn't otherwise exist without the enterprise offering the service.
Racketeering as defined by the RICO act includes a list of 35 crimes.
elaborate topic below
Advised to change the
color of the lights (*inside
(no, it's not the mobsters, the mexicans, chinese, iraq, iran or
afghanistan, it's not the Russians, Japanese, Vietnamese, libya, It's not
Laos or Cuba .... and we dare not call it what it is: manipulation,
coercion, extortion, racketeering, profiteeering, etc. "Our"