Destruction of Personal property
Spectrum/Charter Internet Provider Negligence

The following will include Proof of statement. For a copy of complete full recorded conversations, email



First Spectrum stated it was Arris that was at fault for damaging my hardware (and more!)


It's pretty clear that Spectrum is stating that Arris told them to "push" whatever it is they want to call it (ie. update, firmware, eavesdropping hack, ip redirect manipulation, etc.) But it is clear that Spectrum are blaming Arris in these recordings, correct?

PROOF THAT THEY ARE LIARS, Below is a recording FROM ARRIS THEMSELVES!


BUT THEN THE PLOT THICKENS WHEN I FIND OUT THAT I DON'T EVEN OWN AN ARRIS MODEM!

It's Motorola and is pre-arris buyout as stated by arris themselves!


This action is actually MUCH MORE than just hacking a modem and destroying somebody else's property!

This website is developed in regards to the unprovoked blacklisting, hacking/tampering, and termination of personal property caused by Spectrum. Herein Spectrum is used interchangeably for all it's other names, including Spectrum, a.k.a Time Warner, a.k.a Charter Group, a.k.a. Road Runner, a.k.a. Bright House, and any other name that the monopoly may be using. Spectrum call for service activation, call log (855) 202-0960,Incoming, 11/20/2017 02:23 PM,00:00:26
Spectrum service was stopped on November 29, 2017
Spectrum BRICKED my personal property AND ADMITTED TO IT~! Recorded conversations (see below)
*See Call logs at bottom of this page
When spectrum failed to make right their wrong I began to publish the issue.
Puco was contacted December 1, 2017 Case: KHEN113017OR
FCC was contact December 2, 2017 FCC Ticket No. 2077867
December 3, 2017 upload conversation to YouTube
After the video was censored, I upload the recorded Spectrum conversations again on December 13, 2017
January 14, 2018 I contacted Consumer Affairs, Jamie at ConsumerAffairs<members@consumeraffairs.com14 jan. at 06:01
January 27, 2018 posted the issue on pissedconsumer.com #1177451
February 1, 2018 Motorola responded concerning Incident: Incident # 27750 and #180202-010823

I also promptly filed a claim with spectrum, claim ticket #26135861
Other claims were made with FTC reference number: #92612426
Ohio Attorney General complaint reference number is: WK000088855
FCC New
Ticket No. 2228714

Synopsis:

Spectrum on day one of service, added THEIR modem to 3 blacklists thereby availing only tainted "service". In an effort to solve the problem, the spectrum agent and myself tried my personal modem (a Motorola modem), it worked fine for the few hours it was up until Spectrum decided to "push firmware" into my modem (the wrong firmware) thereby bricking (rendering my property completely broken and unusable).

The internet monopolies censored the bejesus out of the ability to keep the recordings on mainstream sites. Alternative recordings are contained at the bottom of this page.


Despite that I have recorded all the calls and already filed formal complaints, in came the bills and then promptly came the calls from collections agencies (yes, plural!)

Even if Spectrum's second excuse or statement is to be believed (that arris told them to do it), Arris adamantly refute the Spectrum Claim altogether

Arris states NO UPDATES AVAILABLE


Play Arris Statement vs Spectrum Claims

This Web-page is commenced on January 10, 2018 and is not yet complete. Yet look what happened after I filed my complaints (seen below, and now I get collections calls daily from more than one collections agency even though I've received no service and no product!). Timeline of "Service" with Spectrum (November 2017), then I file with a slew of "consumer protection agencies" throughout November / December of the same year, and by January I'm receiving collections notices when in fact Spectrum owes me!

Spectrum hacked personal property stating later that Arris told them to do it. Arris refutes the claim made by Spectrum and the Arris website shows Arris is telling the truth



Visiting Arris' Website shows they are telling the truth
The following is found on Arris' Website for their modem.
Arris Website - No Drivers or UpdatesArris Website - No Drivers or Updates



But enough of this Spectrum blaming Arris farce because....

I DON'T EVEN OWN AN ARRIS MODEM in the first place!

Save the admissions for some other modem owner, perhaps someone that owns an Arris Modem! My Motorola modem series was designed and developed PRIOR TO ARRIS' buyout of the Motorola line modem and contained at least a couple of features that the Arris modem does not contain, those features are not to be mis-construed as "bugs", as the Spectrum Agent made reference to. Those features are:

1.) The ability to reboot the modem (this is a "bug" according to spectrum)
2.) The ability to flash the modem back to factory condition (removing this feature traps the owner to the whims of the upstream, our embedded IP providers, aka our weakest link)
There were physical differences between the modems also.
Here is what the Arris modem looks like (click to enlarge):
Arris Modem 1st photoArris Modem Arris Modem 2nd photoArris Modem
This is what my MOTOROLA modem looks like (click to expand):
Motorola Modem 1st photoView 1 of my modem Motorola photo 2View 2 of my modem

The software contained in each of the modems is markedly different also


The Arris modem hasn't any useful features aside from being a simple stripped-down version of my modem, it was merely an intermediary device that allowed no user control.

This is what my Motorola modem's software looked like before the damaging actions caused by Spectrum:
My modem's software before hackThis is my modem's software before the Spectrum Hack, Photo 1
My modem's software before hack 2This photo shows both features eliminated by Spectrum Tampering
Spectrum acknowledge that they removed these features from my PERSONAL property without my consent, then they profess that it was Arris software that was involved, then they blame Arris for telling them to do it!~
Yet even if I HAD an Arris modem, I am highly upset that these monopoly-types can feel so righteous in hacking other property that they do not own. Can they manipulate an entire community to suddenly need to replace modems and thereby increase the sales for a friend at Best Buy (as an example)?
If they can do it to my modem (which isn't running some fly-by-night software, it's BSD and LINUX that they hacked through; that in itself is very disturbing to know now due to another somewhat related past issue).

Rather than offering to remedy the situation, the arrogant monopoly sends 5 different bills in less than 3 weeks (with 5 different amounts)

How do we get so many different priced bills all in the same month? *profiteering for no service and no product

Below are the myriad of bills that the monopoly responded with (as opposed to a humane apology letter).
Notice the prices are all over the place, and that their expectations for profit are for NON-service (*The same day that the monopoly's modem arrived in the mail is the same day that I called to inquire how I was summarily added to three blacklists instantaneously without cause or justification whatsoever and that I would try my modem and see if that changes anything, otherwise I need to cancel because your (spectrum) service would not be good for me (or anyone summarily added to a secret blacklist). The blacklists affect most search engines from wanting to count my server's websites. Being on a blacklist is damaging to anyone, whether business or private (I started a website years ago when spectrum was using a different alias, that being Time Warner. Adding people to blacklists are apparently accomplished without the Nation's Judiciary, monopoly is the intermediary, and by all counts, were at one time illegal).

There had been no service received, but in came the odd bills
THE SERVICE WAS JUST TURNED ON WHEN THE SPECTRUM MODEM ARRIVED, HOW IS THIS BILL LEGITIMATE?
November 20, 2017 - $89.97 1st bill for no service or product1st bill for no service or product

Later in the week came another bill with a different price

I even already filed with the FCC, consumer affairs, and many others!

SO HOW CAN SPECTRUM BE SENDING another BILL at all?


November 26, 2017 - $94.482nd bill for no service or product; different price now 2nd bill; different price
then another, with yet another price
December 1, 2017 - $122.973rd bill for no service or product 3rd bill; another price
And still another bill for yet another amount
December 19, 2017 - $167.964th bill for no service or product 4th bill and yet another price
8 days later I am threatened for non-PAYMENT (even though there had been less hours used than one has digits on their hand; that which ended with negative impact i.e. 3 illegal unwarranted blacklists against the IP address from Spectrum AND later the hacking and/or destroying of my personal modem)
Delinquent Account (!)December 27, 2017"Threat of Delinquent (profiteering?)
5th bill for no service and no product Spectrum insist on blaming Arris (Arris told us to do it)
January 2, 2018 - $83.97Spectrum ProfiteeringSpectrum persists in antagonizing arogantly, they know there's no longer any consumer protections

Keep in mind that I've thus far not received any of my end of our agreement!
The very same day the spectrum modem arrived I am recorded as saying to the spectrum agent over the phone that if we can't remedy the faulty blacklisting which they arbitrarily added me to (3 blacklists), then I'll have to cancel their service, there's nothing I can do with the state in which the internet was being delivered to me.

There is actually another strangely similar incident that occurred years prior to Time Warner having changed its name to Spectrum. The account I started writing years ago is in it's virtually pristine nature in which I left it, and recorded for anyone that wants to read more into how blacklisting is an unprovoked attack and causes obvious damage against the person or group in which it is directed against: http://www.springfield-ohio-post.com/ohiopostunderground/time-warner/

Again, Arris did not even make my modem, nor did they do what Spectrum/Charter evolved to claiming, that Arris told them to do it.

Here is the call logs that show when I first inquired about service and the prompt calls when that service failed
(800) 892-2253,Incoming,01/04/2018 09:01 AM,00:01:42
(614) 827-7914,Incoming,12/07/2017 12:59 PM,00:00:40
(614) 827-7914,Outgoing,12/04/2017 01:30 PM,00:08:11
(614) 827-7914,Incoming,12/04/2017 12:07 PM,00:01:25
(614) 827-7914,Incoming,12/01/2017 06:19 PM,00:00:49
(614) 827-7914,Incoming,12/01/2017 02:59 PM,00:00:47
(614) 827-7914,Incoming,12/01/2017 07:31 PM,00:01:17
(614) 827-7914,Outgoing,12/01/2017 07:12 PM,00:14:37
(855) 202-0960,Outgoing,11/30/2017 05:20 AM,00:00:11
(855) 202-0960,Outgoing,11/30/2017 03:56 AM,00:00:15
(800) 892-2253,Outgoing,11/25/2017 04:43 PM,00:18:52
(855) 202-0960,Outgoing,11/25/2017 04:39 PM,00:03:15
(855) 202-0960,Incoming,11/21/2017 05:02 PM,00:02:19
(855) 202-0960,Incoming,11/21/2017 10:09 AM,00:00:46
(800) 892-2253,Incoming,11/20/2017 10:00 AM,00:00:40
(800) 892-2253,Incoming,11/20/2017 09:02 AM,00:01:19
(855) 202-0960,Incoming,11/20/2017 02:23 PM,00:00:26
(800) 892-2253,Incoming,11/19/2017 06:27 PM,00:01:30
(855) 202-0960,Outgoing,11/19/2017 10:51 AM,00:00:01
(855) 202-0960,Outgoing,11/19/2017 10:46 AM,00:00:23
(855) 202-0960,Incoming,11/19/2017 10:35 AM,00:01:00
(855) 202-0960,Incoming,11/18/2017 03:28 PM,00:01:03
(855) 202-0960,Incoming,11/18/2017 09:47 AM,00:01:00
(855) 202-0960,Incoming,11/17/2017 05:09 PM,00:00:06
(855) 202-0960,Incoming,11/17/2017 01:26 PM,00:00:19
Time Warner Cable/Charter Communications
13820 SUNRISE VALLEY DR ATTN: Olivia Hill, HERNDON, VA, 20171-4659, United States
(877)276-7432 (Daytime),(800)892-2253 (Daytime)
(704)697-4579 (Fax)

When one entity controls our only option for our preferred means of communications, our nation is at risk
If they can take my system down (which runs on BSD and Linux), then is it not conceivable that the solitary entity can take down an entire community the same way?
What about our nuclear weapons? Or our nuclear power plants? What operating systems do you think run those critical areas of our nation's infrastructure? Hint: It's not Microsoft or Macintosh. It's systems that have always been Previously PROVEN to be safer and more secure.
Now we have "our" internet providers exploiting that last bastion.

Nationalize the monopolies, let's use our military for something good for a change! http://usdebtclock.org
Private ownership is only good when there's more than one or two "private" owners at the monopoly board.

Miscellaneous other recordings:

And if the aforementioned account wasn't enough, CHECK OUT THE LATEST DESPERATE MOMENT (when choices are reduced to the illusion of two, AT&T or Spectrum, and both are monopolies of which my websites are informing the public of, it becomes VERY difficult to keep a website up and not sandboxed by the power that be).  Imagine it like this, my primary website (not this one) speaks out against monopoly control and there's no means of getting the word out to my fellow American's because the door I must pass through to host my site is owned by the monopoly!

Spectrum take 3


FINAL NOTES:

Progress Notes:

No updates or firmware is evident.  Covert operations appear to be in place using our internet providers as the intermediary for many of the decision-making that affect the lives of the consumers (whether it be by their integral function of playing the most important role of the illegal "blacklists" or the tampering with devices and equipment in which they are not the lawful owner to do so; all accomplished remotely and not in clear obvious view).


No firmware:

http://www.arris.com/surfboard/products/cable-modems/sb6141/
http://www.arris.com/surfboard/products/cable-modems/sb6141/?gclid=CjwKCAiAjanRBRByEiwAKGyjZfCvAUoC_3MG-CipXZhXNE4zaAnfK46VXSNEmns0wkcBFIctLcR4yBoCd1UQAvD_BwE

******Compatible with major U.S. Cable Providers!!!

My Product number is 581901-016-00
The Model number is sb6141

*The problem is, nowhere on my modem does it include the words, "arris".  Only are there several instances in which indicate "Motorola" and no other name is given on the unit aside from "motorola". (ie. The software inside the unit stated "Motorola" as did the label on the outside of the bought-new unit)

**It appears that the monopoly that has volunteered to make up my decision in what manner I ought to enjoy my own personal property, may have bricked the unit with the incorrect firmware (that being for an Arris version of my modem).
Arris state after checking my model number and product number that the modem is not even theirs.

Whereas the Arris version of the Motorola unit is indicated by a p/n of 581902-022-00 my model number is indicated by p/n 581901-016-00  (not globally conclusive yet)

In addition to the appearance of my modem, which hasn't a hint of the arris logo or any words to indicate arris was ever a part of this modem, we also find that there was a difference between the black and white versions of the modem.  Each had different compositions as stated by the Englander in the following screenshot has specified (paste screenshot here).

Rather than possess the courtesy to announce the unauthorized manipulation of my personal property, the powers-that-be have found it more profitable to merely recant their former recorded testimonies that they, as the internet provider and their stated "engineering department", had made the decision for me (on the hush) and have ushered in a non-applicable "update" into my non-applicable property thereby rendering it "bricked" (broken without the ability to use or access).

Here's the fingerprint of our trusted internet provider (as opposed to random hardware updater with the ordained responsibility to break into hardware and remotely affect it's use to the point of permanent termination).  (paste "tampering2.png" here;  Also paste time stamped "Screenshot at 2017-12-01-29-40.png" here)

Before the forced amputation of my personal property there was not any hint of the word "arris" in the software or dashboard.  Following the breaking in and vandalizing my personal property were found the arris logo at the bottom of the software page within the dashboard (paste in "notice the new "arris" logo at the bottom.png" and "2017-12-01-29-40.png")

 (paste in "Screenshot at 2017-12-09 06-07-17.png)

It appears that the reason one sb6141 may not be like the next, is that the monopoly board dwindled down to one less player in the corporate buyout world.   There appears to be some modems which have the “Arris” and some with the “Motorola” because the Motorola division that manufactures these modems has been gobbled up by the Arris Group, a manufacturer of high-speed data (not modems), video and telephony systems (not modems). From my understanding, this buyout happened in mid-assembly line production of these modems.

In a segment of the topic of the sb6141 modem, are the ominous words: 

"The DOCSIS 3.0 standard enables cable Internet providers to exploit extra capacity through channel-bonding technology."

One must muse after the damage caused by the internet provider, whether the techonological parameters are still in their experimental stage, and my modem just so happened to be found in one of the internet provider's test-tubes.

Accountability. After contacting dozens of "attorneys" and consumer advocate groups, there is no accountability.  No Checks and balances.  No Law that offers the consumer justice because the law is owned by the monopoly interests in 2018.  Immunity of Justice and the neo-monopoly on all socio-politico-econo matters has many wondering of any semblance of a Democracy and real "free"-"trade".

Here are features that you can enjoy from the Motorola SB6141:

>  The modem is compatible with Comcast/Xfinity, Cox, Charter, Time Warner, Mediacom and Bright House, and more.
>  The modem works with Windows, Macintosh, and UNIX computers
>  The modem is BOTH IPv4 and IPv6 supported

The "update" that the internet provider arbitrarily injected into my modem removed the ability to maintain IPv4 leaving only IPv6 capability and disallowed any secure connection (SSL Certificates would fail, was the predominant result).